[ad_1]
[앵커]
Tomorrow (23) will be issued the first trial of Professor Kyung-Shim Chung, accused of suspicion of entrance examination for children and private equity funds. Since the prosecution began the investigation, there has been a great controversy and public opinion has been very divided, in this case attention is being paid to how the first sentence of the court will be handed down. Reporter Na Hye-in reports. People stand at intervals at the Court Complex in Seocho-dong, Seoul. One day before the trial for Professor Kyung-Shim Chung’s first trial, a public lottery was held. Considering that the recommendation for postponement due to the spread of Corona 19 is a case of great social interest, the judiciary decided to proceed with Professor Jeong’s first trial as scheduled. Professor Jeong was brought to trial on 15 charges, including violations of the Capital Market Law, falsification of private documents, and a teacher withholding evidence. Suspicion of corruption in children’s entrance exams, such as falsification of subpoenas that were carried out in court demonstrations, and suspicions of private equity funds, including borrowed name investments or bogus consulting contracts As a suspicion that related evidence was removed for having an employee in a securities company. Previously, the prosecution identified this case as a violation of the privileged class and a new political conflict, and asked the court to sentence Professor Jeong to an average sentence of 7 years in prison and a fine of 900 million won. On the other hand, Professor Jeong’s side reflects on the fact that the family enjoyed benefits without criticism, but has always pleaded their innocence, saying that it was just a case inflated by the objective of the prosecution and over-investigation. Meanwhile, there has always been a coexistence of the opinion that the prosecution tried to defeat the investigation of power-type corruption with the logic of the political field on Professor Jeong’s case, and the extreme evaluation of the investigation type of the ‘system of Indian rain ‘that the prosecution forcefully dug up to protect acquired rights. Socially, it is a case in which the entire town was practically divided in two, which caused a great conflict. I am Hyein Na, YTN. ※ ‘Your report becomes news’ YTN awaits your valuable report.
[카카오톡] Search YTN to add a channel [전화] 02-398-8585 [메일] [email protected] [온라인 제보] www.ytn.co.kr
