[ad_1]
[앵커]
The disciplinary committee, which was hardly held, was not fluid even before deliberation began. President Yoon Suk-yeol’s side requested a denial against up to four of the five members of the disciplinary committee, but the disciplinary committee fired all of them and a fierce nervous war broke out, such as refusing to claim a procedural flaw. Reporter Kang Hee-kyung reports. Among the disciplinary committees, the two prosecutors appointed by Minister Choo Mi-ae, as expected, were Sim Jae-cheol, the attorney general of the Ministry of Justice and Shin Seong-sik, the head of the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office anti-corruption force. . In the end, one of the external members of the committee expressed his thanks and the other was not present. Among the existing external members, only Professor Anjin from Chonnam National University School of Law attended, and Han-Joong Jeong, a professor at Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, who served on the Ministry’s Past History Committee. Justice, was recently appointed a member and represented the presidency. The disciplinary committee meeting, which managed to finish the composition and get started, had a fierce war of nerves from the start. President Yoon Seok-yeol requested a change to the date, saying that the list of committee members was not disclosed and that the inspection record was not viewed correctly. However, the disciplinary committee did not accept all of Yoon’s arguments, saying that it would give them time to prepare for the member’s evasion request and that the records could be read and memorized at any time. The claim that there was a procedural failure due to Minister Chu’s involvement in the appointment of the deadline was also dismissed, saying that there was no problem. President Yoon’s side immediately requested the evasion of the remaining four members of the five committee members, with the exception of the head of the anti-corruption department Shin Sung-sik. There were reasons such as suspicion of justice, but even this was dismissed by the disciplinary committee because Yoon was abusing the right to appeal. However, Shim Jae-cheol, Attorney General of the Ministry of Justice, requested the evasion himself and deliberated on it. However, President Yoon’s side repeatedly raised the issue, saying that director Shim Jae-cheol was not allowed to participate in the resolution process against others. Before the convocation of the disciplinary committee, the fierce battles over the membership list and the prosecution’s records remained intact in the deliberation. In particular, since there are many analyzes that nerve wars on both sides are a pavement for future court disputes, the battles surrounding proceedings are expected to emerge as a problem again in future litigation wars. YTN Kang Hee-kyung[[email protected]]it is. ※ ‘Your report becomes news’ YTN is waiting for your valuable report.
[카카오톡] Search YTN to add a channel [전화] 02-398-8585 [메일] [email protected] [온라인 제보] www.ytn.co.kr
