[ad_1]
■ Progress: presenter Jaeyoon Lee, presenter Seungmin Lee
■ Cast: Attorney Gwangsam Kim
-Jomin saw a national poem three months ago … Are all medical students canceled?
-The Pusan National University medical team “decided to cancel the admission after the final judgment”
-Medical Organization “Request for suspension of the effect of national detention”
◇ Anchor: So the court ruled that there was corruption in the entrance exam. So how will the children’s titles proceed?
◆ Kim Gwang-sam: First, the daughter of former minister Cho graduated from the medical department and then from the doctor’s office … I took the practical exam last September. And on January 7 and 8, I’m supposed to take the written test. However, if you pass, you will earn a medical degree. Then, if it is an internship, you will be given the qualification to treat patients, but now the National University of Pusan will open a committee to pass a judgment with the confirmed results, but there is a story that the president of the National University of Pusan arrived at the National Office last October. According to the application guidelines, there is a rule that if you go through false, fraudulent or forged documents, you will cancel. Most college entrance exams have all of those rules.
So if the Supreme Court confirms yesterday’s ruling, admission to doctors must be canceled, and then the state exam of the doctor itself is based on graduation, according to medical law. So because you can’t get into school, you can’t graduate. Then the situation could come where the doctor’s qualifications could be invalidated.
◇ Anchor: Isn’t it such a situation that you have to wait until the Supreme Court anyway?
◆ Gwangsam Kim: Right. At Pusan National University, if there is a final decision from the Supreme Court, it will be decided at that time.
◇ Anchor: It seems like it will take a long time. You can expect confusion. One of the top three charges was for private equity investment, but some innocence and some guilt emerged. But the most striking thing was 1 billion won relative to Korink’s investment, and that was the bottom line. But I asked you if it was now an investment or a loan, but you judged it as an investment, right?
◆ Gwangsam Kim: Yes. So for a billion, Professor Kyung-Shim Chung and former Minister Cho continued to lend this one. But the judge said the investment is correct.
However, in terms of investment, Korink PE gave around 157 million won to Professor Kyung-Shim Chung on behalf of the consultancy. So, wasn’t this itself given for embezzling money, and was he convicted innocent for that part?
However, the ground for innocence is that the court did not hand it over for the purpose of stealing it, but because it was invested and received in the form of earnings, Professor Kyung-Shim Chung did not acknowledge the embezzlement. . However, in the prosecution’s indictment, it was admitted that they took 157 million won, but the court judged that only the nature of the money and property, and this, was not legally guilty.
[저작권자(c) YTN & YTN plus 무단전재 및 재배포 금지]