[ad_1]
[고진영 / 배재고 교장 : 자사고, 외고, 특목고 등 3개의 변호인단이 각각 헌법소원을 제기해서 진행하고 있는데 이 헌법소원을 통해서 2025년도의 시행령 폐지를 통해서 자사고를 폐지하겠다는 내용도 철회되리라고 믿어 의심치 않습니다.]
[조희연 / 서울시 교육감 : 과도한 사교육비를 줄이고 고교 공교육을 정상화하고자 하는 교육 개혁에 역행하는 판결이라고 생각합니다. 즉각 항소하고자 합니다.]
After Busan, the court ruled that the cancellation of the designation of private charter high schools was unfair in Seoul. We examine the reasons for the trial, the controversy, and the prospects. The court found that “retrograde enforcement” was a problem. In the high school’s own redesignation process, the acceptance cut-off line and deduction factor were changed after four months, and the last five years were applied retroactively based on the modified criteria. Actually, Bae’s inventory canceled and Sehwa High’s scores were 65 and 67.5 points, respectively. Private charter high schools were created in 2010 and there are 38 in the country. It was intended to complement the uniformity of the high school leveling and gave more discretion than that of the general high schools, but criticism continued for not fulfilling its role. It was said that it was about encouraging the ‘enlightenment’ of the general secondary schools, which became a ‘college school’ as they swept through students with good grades. There has also been controversy that private education is essential for admission to a private high school, and money ultimately decides the entrance exam. So what was the public opinion about converting from private special purpose high school to general high school? According to an October 2019 poll, 54% agree and 36% do not. More than 10% of opinion polls in November of the same year also indicated that they should become general secondary schools. However, the controversy over ‘Narrow Nambul’ is a drag. The main criticism is that the two sons of Seoul superintendent Cho Hee-yeon, who are promoting abolition, graduated from foreign high school and passed, and are now trying to clear the ladder of rising status. Consultations were also held at a hearing on the candidates for minister. Of course, the opposition party is not free from this problem either. In 2019, a problem arose with universities that selected many students from special high schools and private charter high schools at the time of ‘Jungkook of the Fatherland’, and the Democratic Party proposed a large-scale examination of the entrance examination for children of legislators. . The Korean Liberal Party, the Barunmirae Party and the Justice Party responded quickly, as if enacting special laws, but after that, naturally, it has been absent. This is because the Korean Liberal Party refused to link it with the investigation of state affairs or to include not only members of the National Assembly but also high-ranking officials. Returning to this ruling, the court did not accept the claim that the law that regulated the abolition of private secondary schools until 2025]was “unconstitutional.” As the Ministry of Education has announced its intention to pursue policies regardless of this ruling, it is anticipated that the results of future elections will also be a significant variable, as the Constitutional Court ruling and the reasons for the abolition of secondary schools Private laws are in the form of “executive decrees” rather than laws. Park gwang-ryeol [[email protected]]
