[사회][앵커리포트] ‘Flight problem’ with atrocities …



[ad_1]

Last Saturday there was a written test to recruit policemen.

About 2,700 people were selected from across the country, but 55,000 people applied, bringing the competition rate to 18.8: 1.

There is a controversy about the leak of the problem.

This is inside the test center.

There is something written on the board.

One of the questions was misstated in the Introductory Police Science Elective Course and the corrected question was written directly on the board.

However, there was criticism that the issue was leaked beforehand because the time the issue was written was before walking on individual belongings such as cell phones and textbooks.

We were able to find enough related content by searching the internet, etc., and one examinee even took pictures of the questions written on the board and shared them via smartphone messengers.

[경찰 공무원 수험생 A 씨 : 일단 저도 당연히 억울하고, 억울한 것을 떠나서 국가직 공무원 그것도 경찰 공무원을 뽑는 시험인데 무엇보다 공정해야 하는 시험이 그 부분이 공정하지 않은 거잖아요….]

The police decided to give a score of a question to all those who fail the written test, regardless of whether the question was corrected or the elective was chosen.

It means that those who fall for the difference of 1 question will be relieved, but there is concern that in this case, the remaining physical strength and the proficiency rate for the interview will increase, and the pass or fail may be reversed.

Therefore, the existing candidates are divided into group A, and those who have passed the additional writing by adding a score are divided into group B, and the remaining selection is made.

All officials announced by Group A will be selected, but those who have crossed the passing line from Group A from Group B will be selected additionally, but the examinees will be confused.

[경찰 공무원 수험생 B 씨(CBS 김현정의 뉴스쇼) : 개인적인 의견으로는 재시험을 치르는 게 맞지 않을까 생각은 하는데요. 한편으로는 열심히 준비해서 합격점수에 오른 수험생들도 있는데 그 또한 불이익이 아닐까 생각합니다.]

There is also a more fundamental controversy.

This is the difficulty level of the test, but if you notice a Korean history problem.

This is an evaluation of the achievements of the five kings of the 1st to 5th generation of the Goryeo dynasty by Choi Seung-ro, an official from the early Goryeo period.

The correct answer is to change option 2, “I elevated my teacher” to “I did not.”

Let’s look at question 8 of the Korean story.

It is necessary to select the protest movement of the peasants and the discreet ones who were in power during the period of the leader of the Goryeo Musin regime, Choi Choong-hun.

The ‘Gwangmyeong Illumination Difficulty’ shown in the example is a level that appears only on small maps without further explanation in textbooks.

The reason is ‘discrimination’, but not only is it difficult, it is more of a side effect, but there is a concern that the amount of study will lose meaning and be a struggle to shoot.

Some voices wonder what it has to do with the basic skills and knowledge necessary to perform police functions.

Police responded that they will improve the monitoring and management system of the test site in response to the controversy over the leak.

However, in terms of the level of difficulty, university professors have been asking questions for two or three years, and it is natural that easy and difficult problems are mixed.

Park gwang-ryeol [[email protected]]

[ad_2]