[사회]秋 “The UK, France, etc. are punished for refusing to crack the password” … the fact?



[ad_1]

[앵커]

Controversy continues over the law on mandatory disclosure of mobile phone passwords, publicly debated by Justice Minister Chu Mi-ae.

Minister Chu argued that there are laws in various countries, including Great Britain and France, to punish non-compliance.

I checked the facts to see if it was true.

This is reporter Han Dong-oh.

[기자]

This is an article published on SNS by Minister Chu Mi-ae on the 12th.

In the UK, if a suspect fails to comply with a decryption order, they could face up to five years in prison. In France, the Netherlands and Australia, he emphasized that there are penalties for not complying with decryption.

This is the original text of the British Investigative Authority (RIPA) Regulation Act.

It says: “Any authorized person may impose a requirement for the disclosure of protected information on the alleged possession of a key.”

However, the investigation into mandatory password disclosure materializes in “national security”, “crime prevention and recognition” and “UK economic well-being”.

If not disclosed, child pornography or national security cases will be sentenced to 5 years in prison and other cases up to 2 years in prison.

In France, prosecutors or courts can have everyone take technical measures, such as unlocking a secret code for decryption, and in Australia, if the court allows it, the suspect must provide information to the NCO so that the data can be viewed.

However, most countries in the world, excluding them, do not legally force suspects to crack their passwords.

In the Netherlands, a judge or prosecutor can order someone with a password to unlock it, with the exception of suspects.

In Japan, an executor of a court order can demand “necessary cooperation”, such as cracking a password, from the suspect, but there is no sanction regulation, for which he is not famous.

The United States has decided that the United States Supreme Court does not have to provide the password if the act of providing the password by the suspect is assessed as a “statement” by the suspect.

Whether the information on the mobile phone is the ‘statement’ of the suspect or the ‘information’ that needs to be confiscated, regulations vary little by little, but the world also faces similar concerns that there are elements that violate the basic rights.

YTN Han Dong-oh[[email protected]]it is.

※ ‘Your report becomes news’ YTN is waiting for your valuable report.
[카카오톡] Search YTN to add a channel [전화] 02-398-8585 [메일] [email protected] [온라인 제보] www.ytn.co.kr

[저작권자(c) YTN & YTN plus 무단전재 및 재배포 금지]
[ad_2]