[ad_1]
When the prosecution was investigating the suspicion of “ returning from leave ” while the son of Justice Minister Chu Mi-ae was in the military service, when investigating the public interest informant, Mr. A (service sergeant at the time return from Mr. Seo’s leave) for reference, “Documents such as a service order was confirmed on the 9th. He asked if he had any military documents to prove that his son had returned from vacation on June 25, 2017. Upon hearing This, it is known that Mr. A felt embarrassed and replied: “How does the private get military documents?” The situation continues to arise that the prosecution was unwilling to investigate and tried to crush the case, such as the suspected omission of the statement ‘Request for extension of license of Seo with Chu’.
The power of the people According to conversations between Assemblyman Kim Do-eup and Mr. A, Mr. A was investigated as a reference by the Seoul Eastern District Prosecutor’s Office in June this year. At that time, prosecutors examined the order submitted by the military and asked whether Mr. A was supposed to be on duty on “ Friday, June 23, 2017. ” Mr. A said it was three years ago in the survey at the time, so he did not know the exact date and responded with the intention that “it seems correct”.
However, after returning from the investigation, Mr. A reconfirmed that his workday was correct on June 23, 2017. I looked up my GPS logs and conversations on social media. Subsequently, he changed his shift on duty at that time, went out for the night on June 23, 2017, and learned that he had been on duty on June 25 of the same year.
Mr. A called the prosecutor again four days after being investigated by the prosecution and said: “I checked again and started work on June 25, 2017.” Then the prosecution got confused and said: “Isn’t it June 23, 2017? The investigation was narrowing down to the 23rd. “June 23, 2017 is the end of the second vacation for Minister Chu’s son. If Mr. A was on duty on June 23, 2017 and the vacation was extended that day, then Minister Chu’s son could not return or leave the vacation.
However, if Mr. A was put on duty on June 25, 2017, the story is different. This is because Minister Chu’s son did not return from vacation on June 23, 2017 and the vacation was extended two days later due to complaints or requests, which could violate military criminal law.
Upon hearing Mr. A’s words, the prosecution said, “Please fax the data,” and Mr. A said, “There is no fax nearby.” In response, the prosecution asked the prosecution to “email the data,” and Mr. A emailed his GPS data and social media conversations to the prosecution, demonstrating that the timing Seo’s vacation non-return took place on June 25, 2017. issued.
The prosecutor who received the data was confused and repeatedly asked, “Isn’t the business day June 23?” Mr. A said, “Even if I look at the GPS logs, I went to Jongno overnight on the 23rd, returned to the unit on the night of the 24th, and took office on the 25th.” He said. Then the prosecution asked Mr. A: “I have to prove (your words) with documents, do you have any documents?” Even after receiving various pieces of information, Mr. A said: “How do I get the documents in service after the soldiers in the army are discharged?” A people power official said: “Looking at Mr. A’s testimony, isn’t the situation where the prosecution tried to address the issue of Minister Chu’s son’s return from vacation without charge?”
Until now, the prosecution has been controversial for the lukewarm response to this case. At the end of January, the prosecution assigned the case to the first criminal division of the Seoul Eastern District Prosecutor’s Office. The Dongbu District Prosecutor’s Office crushed the case and only five months later told the prosecutor’s attorney: “In the case of Minister Chu’s son, the Military Penal Law should apply any of the provisions of Article 30 (1) (withdrawal of military service) and Article 30 (2) (no unauthorized departure). You do it? He asked an absurd question. While investigating the cadres of Minister Chu’s children, he also omitted a statement saying that “Minister Chu received a call from an aide requesting an extension of Mr. Seo’s vacation.” The chief prosecutor and investigator in this case, who suspect ‘missing statements’, rejoined the investigation team recently.
In addition, the Ministry of Justice appointed Attorney General Kim Gwan-jeong, who established a corner with Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol during the prosecution’s time as the chief prosecutor, as the chief prosecutor of the Dongbu District Prosecutor’s Office. did. The Dongbu District Prosecutor’s Office is a high school student from the Seoul Central District Prosecutor’s Office, Seong-yoon Lee. A people power official said: “To resolve the suspicion of squashing the past case, we have to investigate properly even now.” “If the case is narrowed or hidden, we will conduct a special prosecution or investigation into state affairs.”
