[ad_1]
[앵커]
Two years have passed since our Supreme Court ruled on reparations against Japanese companies that committed human rights abuses through forced mobilization during the Japanese occupation. Despite winning the lawsuit, the victims still do not receive compensation and the Japanese side consistently ignores voices calling for the dialogue to be resolved. Reports from Tokyo correspondent Lee Gyeong-ah. Two years after the Supreme Court ruled that Japanese companies pay alimony for the suffering of the victims of forced mobilization. As the situation remained unchanged, citizens demanding a solution returned to the streets. After the rally, the participants submitted a request to Japan Steel headquarters to implement the Korean Supreme Court compensation ruling. However, Nippon Steel consistently responds to the stage, simply repeating that it was all settled by the Korea-Japan Claims Agreement. Mitsubishi, which was sentenced to severance pay after Japan Steel, is also closing its ears to voices in meeting its responsibilities. After eight months, diplomatic officials from Korea and Japan met again, but parallels were still running on the issue of the monetization of Japanese corporate assets. The exchange of opinions is taking place underwater, focused on the political fields of both countries, on a solution that does not undermine these two premises: the Korea-Japan Claims Agreement and the Supreme Court ruling. However, the time remaining for elderly victims is gradually decreasing, with a situation in which it is not known when or what conclusions will be drawn. I’m Kyungah Lee from YTN in Tokyo.
