[ad_1]
Defense Minister Chung Gyeong-du (pictured left) awaits an answer to the question from the National Assembly government on the 15th. That day, legislators from opposition parties questioned intensely about the suspicion. preferential leave for the son of the Minister of Justice, Chu Mi-ae, who served in the army. Minister Chu attended the State Council meeting held at the Seoul Government Complex that day. Kim Dong-ju [email protected], Reporter Yang Hoe-seong“One soldier only had treatment papers for 4 days, so 10 days of the 2 weeks of sick leave were deducted from the annual leave instead of the sick leave. There is no difference from Seo Private (the son of Justice Minister Chu Mi-ae). Is the discrimination correct? “
“I know it is the correct procedure to do like that friend (as an example).” (Defense Minister Jung Kyung-du)
In a questionnaire on the 15th in the field of diplomacy, reunification and security in the National Assembly, the interior of the market swayed for a moment when Minister Chung said this about the suspicion of preferential holidays for his son Seo-mo during his military service. Mr. Seo responded with the effect that it was not appropriate for the procedure to take 19 days of sick leave to receive medical treatment for 4 days in June 2017. Rep. Ha asked again, “Is it correct that the reporter is valid? and that Mr. Seo is wrong? “, and the Minister replied,” Yes. ” In response, Congressman Ha corrected his position and said, “Thanks for the honest answer.”
Minister Chung corrected his comments an hour and ten minutes later. In addition, the representative of the Democratic Party, Lee Jae-jung, gave the minister the opportunity to speak in this regard and said: “It seems that there is something that has not been explained correctly in the exchange process as if taking an exam. . Minister Chung said, “There was a part that I did not understand correctly in Congressman Ha’s question. There is nothing particularly different from the current position of the Ministry of Defense (there is no problem with Mr. Seo’s vacation).” This means that there are no problems with regulations.
○ Defense Minister called ‘Bad Judging the Commander’
Minister Chung, who was the target of intense attacks by opposition lawmakers, said that day that “the administration process is quite inadequate.” He stressed several times that there is no problem with extending vacation time and it is not preferential treatment for Mr. Seo. In particular, in this process, Minister Chung said that it is possible to extend sick leave over the phone, which is socially controversial. Representative Ha told the Minister of Justice that a man who had lived in the military at the same time as Seo tipped the MP’s office. There is. Isn’t that obvious discrimination (with Seo). “In response, Minister Chung said,” I think this is the part the commander should have been careful about. “According to the regulations, it is possible to extend sick leave for phone, but the commander made a mistake.
To Rep. Seong Il-jong’s question about whether the vacation was verbally extended during active duty, Minister Chung replied, “If you ask me for a valid reason, you must administer the vacation.” However, when representative Won-sik Shin said, “You can leave the territory only if you have a license certificate, not a verbal approval,” the minister said. “It’s a reasonable word,” adding: “Even if you approve verbally, you must get a license order.” (Seo’s case) says that there is a clerical error because I have to pay that, but I didn’t. ”
○ Members of the ruling party, actively covered by Minister Chung Gyeong-du
Minister Chung repeatedly emphasized that “the writing record for the first basic sick leave, the second sick leave request and the love songs still stands” in the ongoing investigations of opposition lawmakers. Here, the log is the log of interviews between Mr. Seo and the unit officer and the unit operations log. Based on this, Minister Chung said, “The commander would have judged it well and approved.”
The opposition party questioned this point. Representative Shin said, “Interview registration is only one of the processes and you need a vacation pass to leave the unit. If there is only one interview, do I need a vacation pass? “, Critical. However, Minister Chung refuted, saying, “If there is a basis for (sick leave) in the interview diary, it cannot be accepted if not.
“There are many cases similar to Mr. Seo,” said the Minister of the Day. “There have been 35 cases of vacation extensions (like Mr. Seo) recently in the ROK Military Support Group, and there have been 5 extensions more than twice “. However, like Mr. Seo, he did not immediately respond to the question, saying: “I will verify” the question about whether the number of cases satisfies three things: △ extension of the vacation through the telephone call of the unit, △ 19 days of sick leave for only 4 days of hospital treatment and △ sick leave without medical examination.
On this day, ruling party lawmakers criticized opposition party lawmakers who only asked about the case of Minister Chu’s son while actively covering for the minister. Democratic Party congressman Kim Yong-min said: “Is there anything that the series of processes deviates from common sense? Is Seo Vacation A Violation Of Regulations Or Preferential Treatment? “Representative Min Hong-cheol from the same party said:” The parents of (military soldiers) communicate with (military commanders) in various ways, such as by phone, Kakao Talk and gangs, and whenever the soldiers are sick, they are allowed to receive outpatient treatment autonomously. ”
Reporter Kim Joon-il [email protected]
Copyright by dongA.com All rights reserved.
