[ad_1]
On the 1st, Justice Minister Choo Mi-ae followed President Moon Jae-in and Prime Minister Jeong Sye-gyun. Recently, amid the ‘Chu Mi-ae and Yoon Seok-yeol shared resignation theory’ in the passport, an observation was made on the same day that “Hasn’t Chu-yoon’s joint retirement come true? ”
Prime Minister Jeong Sye-gyun and Minister of Justice Chu Mi-ae attend the State Council meeting held at the Seoul Government Complex in Jongno-gu, Seoul on the 1st. News 1
Minister Chu watched the video of the State Council meeting held at the Seoul Government Complex at 10 am that day. Before the State Council meeting, he worked alone with Prime Minister Chung in the Prime Minister’s office at the Seoul Government Complex for 10 minutes. He also joined the President of the Council of State alongside Prime Minister Chung.
An official from the Prime Minister’s Office told JoongAng Ilbo that day, “Prime Minister Jung called the minister to the stop of the former State Council office” and said, “I must have presented the discussion that took place at the lunch with President Moon the day before. ”
At the weekly Blue House meeting the day before, Prime Minister Chung told President Moon, “The conflict between the two is placing a great burden on the administration of the government. It is desirable that President Yoon resign voluntarily, but if does not withdraw, it is necessary to consider plans to resign with Minister Chu. “It is said that he said the purpose. President Moon replied, “I have a lot of problems too.”
On the morning of that morning, Minister Chu, who had an interview with Prime Minister Chung, went to the Blue House around 11:15 a.m., immediately after the meeting of the State Council, and met with the President Moon separately. Minister Chu’s visit to the Blue House was not announced. President Moon presided over the Council of State meeting through video at the Blue House.
A Casa Azul official said: “Today’s interview is an informal program and cannot confirm the content of the discussion.” The Justice Ministry said, “(Minister Chu) entered the Blue House and informed the president about the current situation,” and said: “We are pleased to inform you that there was no discussion about the resignation at the time of the president’s report and the prime minister interview “.
Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol arrives to work at the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office in Seocho-gu, Seoul, on the afternoon of the 1st to reveal his position. Reporter Lim Hyun-dong
Amid the theory of unprecedented resignation, the key figure in the passport on the unprecedented retirement of the president-first president was: “It is not a process of seeking the intention of Minister Chu for shared resignation and, at the same time, it does not mean that he will open the retreat by sending an indirect message to Yoon In this regard, an official from the Prime Minister’s Office said: “In some cases, we do not rule out the possibility that Prime Minister Jeong will meet directly with President Yoon and request resignation. ”
Negative public opinion, such as the collective reaction of the prosecution, is observed to have influenced the passport which initially had a strong “ Yoon Seok-yeol impression ” bias towards the shared retirement theory. In particular, on that day, the oversight committee of the Ministry of Justice decided that the removal from office of President Yoon was inappropriate due to the consensus of the seven members, and professors from legal departments across the country made a statement and insisted on that Minister Chu’s measures “violate due process.” In a situation where it is difficult to induce the voluntary resignation of President Yoon, and it is a burden for President Moon to fire Yoon, the mutual resignation theory emerged as a “ policy of consideration. ”
However, it is unclear whether President Yoon will accept the mutual withdrawal theory. In particular, on the afternoon of that afternoon, the Seoul Administrative Court accepted the request for suspension of the execution of the exclusion of duties by the Minister of Justice, saying: “The exercise of specific command and supervision by the Minister of Justice must be kept to a minimum to achieve democratic control. ” The dominant analysis is that Yoon will take the lead in the confrontation between Minister Chu and President Yoon.
The opposition criticized the mutual retreat theory as “a trick to oust Yoon by taking Chu Mi-ae as a private stone.” Ho-young Joo said at the countermeasures meeting at the hospital this morning: “It is correct that the prime minister with the right to remove a member of the Council of State suggests removing the Minister of Justice Chu Mi-ae, who claims that people She is wrong President Yoon, who investigates life power properly, voluntarily investigates “I don’t know what kind of strange idea is right to give up.”
Reporters Taehwa Kang and Kijung Kim [email protected]
[ad_2]
