秋 responds to ‘Exit’ and snipers … Silence on ‘coordinates’ controversy

Justice Minister Choo Mi-ae responded to the Blue House’s national request and again fired at Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol. Front-line prosecutors continue to express concern against Minister Chu, but it appears that they avoided immediate responses and directed their arrows at General Yoon.

Within the prosecution, it is argued that it is not appropriate for Minister Chu to adopt a position based solely on the Blue House request rather than seeking opinions from prosecutors on the front line. Some analysts say they are trying to divide the other side without responding to prosecutors who are concerned about Minister Chu’s political neutrality.

According to the Ministry of Justice on the 3rd, Minister Chu announced a statement at 3 pm on the same day that “the words and actions of the prosecution are undermining the political neutrality of the prosecution and undermining public confidence.”

He also said: “I am well aware that most front-line prosecutors are faithful to their duties and are doing their best,” he said. “As Minister of Justice, I am fully aware of the responsibility to ensure the political neutrality of the prosecution.” The admission statement is in the form of a response to the Blue House request. Cheong Wa Dae’s petition bulletin board read: “The political president is ruining the impeachment with politics. A petition has been raised calling for the resignation of the prosecutors who leave for the president of the politician. It is a bitter expression. The prosecutor has pointed out that the internal network of the prosecution targets Minister Chu and makes excessive use of inspection power.

Therefore, Minister Chu wrote on his Facebook page: “If it comes out like this, reform is the only answer,” and Chuncheon District Attorney Choi Jae-man said: “The situation where politicians they cover the accusation with the same intentions that this prosecutor is our judicial history. It is clear that he has set a bad precedent in ‘I believe’.

Since then, prosecutors working on the front line of detectives and courts have expressed their support, saying, “We are Lee Hwan-woo, Choi Jae-man, and we are going out.” Only 300 comments are known to have been received by Prosecutor Choi.
Inside the prosecution it is said that although Minister Chu himself gave clues about the controversy, he only heard the voices of some sympathizers who made the request instead of the opinions of front-line prosecutors.

The local prosecutor’s office said: “It is not simply a backlash against institutional reform that the prosecutors recently commented on. He said: “(By the way), most front-line prosecutors are running the legal administration only relying on the public opinion of some supporters, neglecting the opinions of the field.”

Other prosecutors also said, “It is not that front-line prosecutors are commenting that they will protect General Yun,” he said. “It is a matter of shooting an individual prosecutor or abusing the supervisory authority, but it seems that Minister Chu is changing the framework.”

There is also an analysis that Minister Chu, who faced a backlash from front-line prosecutors, took the position of controlling President Yun.

In fact, on that day, the announcement of Minister Chu’s position was made around 3 pm, and Yoon meets with the new chief prosecutors beginning at 4:30 pm to digest the education and dinner schedule. At this meeting, President Yun can strengthen internal ties and comment on issues such as the right to direct the investigation, but as Minister Chu, he said he wanted to block that possibility.

A prosecution official said: “If the previous staff was in the same form as the Special Department and the Criminal and Courts Department, it seems that this time, there is an attempt to split between the President and the reviewing prosecutor.”