[ad_1]
In addition, Democratic Party representative Lee Nak-yeon sits down after taking commemorative photographs at the first meeting of the Special Committee on Prosecutor Reform held at the National Assembly on the 29th. Also in attendance were Chief Commissioner Kim Jong-min (right) and the chairman of the judicial committee, Yoon Ho-jung (left). Yunhap news
On the 29th, the Korean Democratic Party announced at the first meeting of the Special Committee on Reform of the Prosecutor’s Office (hereinafter, the Special Commission of the Prosecutor’s Office), saying: “There was no discussion about the theory of the prosecution of Yoon Seok- yeol “(Special Indictment Committee Spokesperson Hyung Oh). The leader of the Democratic Party, Lee Nak-yeon, said in all his comments: “Many opinions flow from within and outside the party. I hope the Special Commission melts all those opinions like a furnace and serves to draw the clearest conclusions. “Ho-joong Yun, chairman of the judicial committee, who is considered the core of the pro-moon, said:” The idea that reform must be achieved through systems and systems, not by humans. ”
President Lee emphasized the day before The message was clear that the focus was on “reform of the institutional prosecutor’s office.” On this day, however, comments directed at Yoon’s individual, such as the impeachment theory, sporadically erupted throughout the Democratic Party. ‘Like Hoe’, mainly from the so-called ‘guardianship of the motherland’ like Kim Nam-guk, Kim Yong-min and Choi Kang-wook, held a press conference this morning and said: “It can be assessed that the reasons for the indictment against President Yun have been established only with the facts confirmed so far. In the National Assembly, there must be a discussion about development.
Democratic Party lawmaker Kim Gyeong-hyup spoke about the investigation of President Yoon’s mother-in-law, saying, “President Yoon cannot or cannot hold the office of attorney general. The conflict of interest of public officials is a symbol of injustice and corruption. Why is President Yoon Seok-yeol the only exception? Representative Kim Seong-ju of the same party also said: “It is even more surprising to regard a hero as if a rebellion against human rights is a resistance to any living power.” “Prosecutor Yoon Seok-yeol is challenging the constitutional spirit head-on and ignoring the rule of law and is doing something without realizing it. I wrote.
文 Out of control even in apology
President Moon Jae-in is presiding over the 63rd Meeting of the Council of State held in the Blue House Women’s Room on the 29th. News 1
It is the emergence of the loki (discreet, modest response) strategy of the party leadership, which the legislators Kang Sung did not accept and acted independently. Shortly after the court decided on the 24th to return to President Yoon’s office, the Democratic Party leadership responded, despite embarrassment, that “we must fight for institutional reform through legislation” (reelection senior member) . It was an atmosphere to avoid excessive agitation and promote the long-term task called ‘Prosecution Reform Season 2’ as soon as possible.
The next day, when President Moon Jae-in said in an apology to the public: “The Ministry of Justice and the prosecution should apply follow-up measures such as the reform of prosecution and investigation rights through stable cooperation.” The Democratic Party immediately converted the current energy agency (TF) reform working group into the TF prosecution reform. Answered. On the 28th, the two candidates (Kim Jin-wook and Lee Kun-ri) were recommended to the president on the 28th by expediting the recommendation of the head of the criminal investigation agency of senior public officials.
However, supporters of the stiffness in favor of the moon are not satisfied with the move. The reactions are that it will not be satisfactory only by advancing the existing institutional reform. On the 29th, on the notice board of the Democratic Party rights party and the friendly-minded community, public opinion unhappy with the candidates recommended by the Minister of Public Affairs and said: “Political prosecutors and two political judges are worst precedents “and” Does it make sense that the prosecution and Kim & Chang are the final candidates for the prosecution? ” Flooded.
Fear of the lame duck … with cracks
Democratic Party lawmakers like Kim Yong-min and Jang Kyung-tae, along with Democratic Party Representative Choi Kang-wook, are holding a press conference in the National Assembly on the 29th to pass a bill to enact the Law on the Prosecutor’s Office and abolish the Law on the Prosecutor’s Office. Reporter Oh Jong-taek
It is analyzed that the attack by the Democratic Party legislators on President Yoon was the result of the demand of supporters who showed a pattern of consolidation of the field. It is said that at a general meeting of members of the House of Representatives that Kim Tae-nyeon convened this afternoon, focusing on Representative Kim Doo-gwan and Min Hyeong-bae, “(President Yoon) should prepare all the requirements for the impeachment so he can be charged at any time. ”
Eventually, the 4 · 7 reelection was advanced three months. It’s a time when craving for lame ducks at the end of the four-year term in office can only be compounded by a sense of crisis that cannot be turned away from the fighting between the fields. Tae-gon Yoon, Director of Political Analysis at Moa “Lame Duck does not appear as a conflict with the opposition party or the opposing faction, but it is generally expressed in a way that the spirit does not communicate inside.”And pinched. The hard-line theory within the Democratic Party, which does not subside with the president’s change of status message, is interpreted as proof of the beginning of the lame duck.
The Democratic Party, which boasted a perfect “one team” keynote speech before and after the general election, is already showing signs of public cracking. In the morning of the morning, Representative Kim Yong-min proposed a bill to establish an independent prosecutor’s office on behalf of the ‘Public Prosecutor’s Office’, which Representative Park Joo-min affirmed the day before. When asked if he should have a good relationship with the party leadership, “it is not a special agreement. We have been discussing it on behalf here now. An hour later, Public Prosecutor’s Office spokesman Ogi-hyung told reporters: “I understand Representative Kim’s amendment to the Prosecution Law and the bill to establish the Prosecution as a single opinion. There will be more diverse ideas within the special committee. ”
Reporters Saerom Sim and Hongbeom Kim [email protected]
[ad_2]
