Uhan’s Lab Responds: The Crown Didn’t Come From Us | People



[ad_1]

The allegations that the coronation pandemic came from a laboratory in the capital of the Chinese province of Uhan are “malicious” and “unfounded” and contradict all available evidence, said the director of the Uhan Institute of Biology (WIV) and director of the National Labor Office. Yuan Zimming safety in Reuters.

On April 15, United States President Donald Trump said his government was investigating whether the settler came from Uhan’s laboratory.

“The Wuhan Biology Institute (WIV) has neither the intention nor the ability to design and create a new colonnade,” the Chinese professor said in a written question to Reuters. “Also, there is no information on the Sars CoV-2 genome to indicate that it was created by humans.”

Some conspiracy theories have been fueled by a study by the Indian Institute of Technology, which has circulated and withdrawn in the meantime. He claimed that the coronary proteins were “unusually similar” to those of the HIV virus. But most scientists say the new virus comes from wildlife. Bats and dolphins are considered potential hosts.

“More than 70% of infectious diseases are caused by animals, especially wild animals,” Professor Yuan said in response to a question from Reuters. “In recent years, we have noted that there is an increasing risk of close contact between humans and wildlife, global climate change and the continued expansion of human activities,” he said.

The seven known human-like coronaviruses come from bats, mice, or pets, scientists say.

Professor Yuan also rejected theories that the laboratory had accidentally released a monster that it had extracted from bats for research because the laboratory’s biosecurity procedures were strictly enforced. “The high-level biosecurity laboratories have advanced protection facilities and are implementing stringent measures to ensure the safety of the laboratory and protect the environment from the risk of contamination,” said Yuan.

Source: RES – EIA



[ad_2]