[ad_1]
With the proposal of the headquarters prosecutor on the guilt of the two accused, the trial for the brutal murder of the student Eleni Topaloudi in Rhodes, which shocked all of Greece, will enter the final stretch tomorrow.
The prosecutor’s speech is awaited with great interest since throughout the evidentiary process the prosecution thoroughly examined all the witnesses, but they did not turn them over to the accused even during his apologies.
In fact, today he left a close impression on the second of them, of Albanian origin, who completed his apology in the form of love responses, reiterating the subject of the subscription after the crime that Roditis’s parents accused and his grandmother offered to disappear information of your place. of wild murder, which took place in the family cabin.
They all lie about the conviction of the prosecutor, the two defendants, Roditis’s father and grandmother, as well as the sister of the second defendant who testified in court.
In fact, the defendant could not bear the pressure of the prosecutor at some point in his apology and asked that the trial be stopped, but she denied it and said, “No, you are not here at Hilton, you are charged.”
The prosecutor also referred to the modus operandi of the two defendants, according to which the defendant took the girls to Roditis, who was putting the money due to the financial surface of his family.
The following dialogues are typical:
Prosecutor: When did you meet her? (means the victim)
Defendant Alexandros, about 21 years old today, responds by saying that he met her on the night of November 25, 2018. The defendant admitted that he and his girlfriend were attracted to the girls and shared them and that the same day he met Eleni , there was an incident with two other girls. They started going for Lindo but came back at the last minute when one of the girls asked for it, saying, as an excuse, an excuse. “It bothered me that they lied and I took it selfishly,” the defendant said.
The prosecutor, then, says “the same modus operandi that you bring to the girls.”
Prosecutor: Anyway, didn’t you know Eleni that your sister told us for a week?
In the prosecutor’s constant questions about what Eleni’s house was like, the accused could not, according to the prosecutor, be convinced that he had visited it, as he stated in his apology. “It just came to our attention then. You have never set foot in Eleni’s house, it’s all lies.”
The prosecutor then asked the defendant about his initial testimony, where he stated that he had seen Eleni drinking morning coffee with coffee, while now claiming that she was drinking vodka. “In addition to being perverted, sex-obsessed, quirky and paranoid that the co-defendant told you, is she an alcoholic too?” The defendant at the scene returned to his original testimony, saying he drank retsin but no coffee.
Disputes with the prosecutor
Regarding the message that both defendants claim that Eleni sent to the second defendant, asking him “if he is ready for a trio”, he insisted that such a message existed but deleted it after the incident because he was scared. At the time, the prosecutor told him that the message did not exist and that if he had, he could have removed it but had kept it in a way that only he would know.
When the defendant claimed that Roditis’s truck was taken because he had no money to buy gasoline, the prosecutor said, “My impression is that his financial deficits were covered by the other.” One finds the girls, that is, you and the other put the money. “
When the prosecutor asks the defendant about the time they arrived at Eleni’s house after 11:30 pm, he says that he sent a message to Eleni that wrote “we arrived” and that she replied, “who did you get to? ? “
Defendant: I went upstairs
Prosecutor: Did he tell you to go upstairs?
Defendant: No.
Prosecutor: Didn’t you know who Manolis was? Did you come up to resolve the dispute?
The prosecutor reminded her of the testimony of Eleni’s friend, according to which they were talking on the phone at the time and Eleni told her that the doorbell rang and that she was probably the girl he met.
Prosecutor: Time is up and Eleni wonders who she is? What kind of communication are you talking about? I tell you that you leave suddenly without any consultation and when you leave the camera you get caught.
The prosecutor also questioned the defendants’ allegations that Eleni had offered them a group meeting and objected that in such a case they would be accepted into his home and that he had no reason to go to Lindos. He referred to a video in which Roditis is sitting in the carriage. “Why aren’t they all sitting together in front of us?” It was a cold winter night and why are you anxious from below and walking as shown in the video? Said the prosecutor
Defendant: I want a break
Prosecutor: No, you’re not at Hilton here, you’re charged.
The prosecutor insisted that Eleni followed him because they agreed to go buy kebabs and for this reason asked him to stop in the Kalathos area where there is a souvlaki restaurant, which was closed at the time. He also said that at the time the first defendant might suggest that they go to his home in Lindos to eat, that Eleni did not even know where she was. Even as she mentioned, this period must have been what Eleni realized something was wrong and so she texted her friend asking her to contact her in an hour.
The prosecutor also upheld the accusation of the accused that the three of them played courage or truth that night and during which only Manolis asked and Eleni answered. The prosecutor emphasized that this accusation was first made by the defendant and said to the defendant: “You apologized a lot, the first one to the Coast Guard is consistent with the truth, after the lawyers come in as if they are inconsistent and even subversive” .
The prosecutor questioned the medical opinion presented by the defendant’s defense, according to which the defendant’s passive attitude was due to the medication. The second defendant admitted that he was in the room, as well as his co-defendant. But this layer has not been found.
Prosecutor: Record that there was a mattress in the room. This evidence has not been found. We must consider the role of the father of the father and the mother of the accused in history. To them, I boldly say that they lied, as did the sister of the second accused. The second defendant insisted that he was not involved in the crime and came to question the existence of a second knife. He described Eleni’s desperate efforts to escape.
Defendant: Eleni was hit. Manolis had gripped her tightly and she couldn’t react, she was pushing and crying.
Prosecutor: What did you do with your hands?
Defendant: I didn’t see his hands
Prosecutor: He did not see them because they were hidden and the roles alternated.
Prosecutor: Why did you cover her with a sheet?
Defendant: Not to catch a cold.
Prosecutor: Tragelafos … After all this forest and violence, did you think it would get cold? This was done so that no one would notice you …
Defendant: No.
Prosecutor: How did you go down the stairs?
Defendant: with the sheet over his head
Prosecutor: Aren’t you ashamed of what you say? Do you want to tell us that she went for a walk?
Defendant: That is the truth
Court member: who cleaned the car
Defendant: I don’t know
M. Court: Don’t you think you should clean the car and you weren’t anxious about the car if your co-defendant’s father didn’t see it?
Defendant: He had no reason to be anxious, he did it.
