[ad_1]
Innocent! This was the proposal of the prosecutor Adamantia Oikonomou for the gold deputies, against all the evidence of the criminal action of the neo-Nazi organization with the raid battalions and the Nazi anthems. All but one are innocent. The confessed murderer of musician Pavlos Fyssas, George Roupakias.
The prosecutor had even claimed that all the golden-eyed perpetrators did nothing organized, that all the Nazi crimes were “isolated incidents”, without the knowledge of the Chief, the governors, but also the nuclear chiefs.
From the start of the grand trial, Ms. Oikonomou did not spend a minute investigating the accusation, but instead chose to act with her questions as a “defense attorney”.
In fact, he made a tireless effort to deconstruct the prosecution witnesses and not only adopted the defensive line of Chrysi Avgi, but above all for the murder of Pavlos Fyssas, he finally got over it after he demanded that everyone be acquitted except Roupakia, when Michaloliakos himself »Nuclear chief Patelis and the entire Local Organization of Nicea, in his attempt to place the criminal responsibility exclusively on them and escape himself. 
According to the prosecutor, there appeared to be no central planning by the party or an order from Nikos Michaloliakos for the commission of criminal acts.
Referring to the testimonies of the prosecution witnesses, the prosecutor said that they either did not have their own knowledge and expressed opinions, judgments, conclusions, or regarding the accused, that their allegations consisted of vagueness, conjecture, inaccuracies and “irrational” facts. .
Only Roupakias is guilty of the murder of Fyssa
It was preceded by the proposal of the prosecutor, who requested the guilt of George Roupakias for the murder of Pavlos Fyssas and the acquittal of the other 17 accused of the murder of Fyssas of the crimes of direct complicity in the murder and simple complicity.
In fact, the prosecutor claimed in her proposal that Ioannis Kazantzoglou, accused of direct complicity in the murder of the 34-year-old musician, was not in G. Roupakias’s vehicle that fateful night.
Roupakias solved and executed the crime in a state of calm, “said the prosecutor and continued:” His intention was to kill the victim, he managed to inflict multiple blows on his body in anger. “
According to the prosecutor, G. Roupakias was “in a calm state of mind that allowed him to think calmly and accept the deadly results of his actions, and with the knife he struck Pavlos Fyssas twice at the level of his heart.”
The prosecutor requested the rejection, as unfounded, of the allegation made by G. Roupakias, according to which he was in the defense that night, because as he said it did not turn out to be a hearing.
“His claim that he was attacked is unfounded.” He had decided his criminal intention, he hit the victim with absolute success, “said the prosecutor, asking at the same time to reject the request presented by the accused for a change of accusation. Under these circumstances , the prosecutor requests that G. Roupakias be found guilty, as charged, that is, of murder. 
As for the defendant Ioannis Kazantoglou, accused of direct complicity in the murder and the other accused of the murder of Fyssa, 16 of his co-defendants for simple complicity, the prosecutor proposed his acquittal.
Among other things, the prosecutor stated that “the aforementioned defendants were unable to realize Roupakia’s murderous intent. Roupakias’ appearance at the scene was accidental at the scene of the murder, “said the prosecutor and continued:” If there was a plan, Roupakias would already be in the offices of the Golden Dawn Local Organization, without the need for a call previous telephone ”.
They didn’t give an order!
The prosecutor also stated that there was no warrant from Golden Dawn management for the murder of Pavlos Fyssas.
Among other things, the prosecutor, citing evidence from the evidentiary process and testimonies, stated in her speech: “No statements were heard indicating that the murder of Fyssa was ordered or that it was κανένα. There was no evidence to show that the murder of Fyssa was premeditated by Golden Dawn Leadership. Doesn’t seem like she gave an order. “
“After all, what would the benefit to Golden Dawn be.” If Fyssa’s murder was indeed planned in advance, why was it committed in a central location and not another night in another secluded location so that the crime would not become visible? .
The acquittal for the attacks against PAME and the Egyptian fishermen
The prosecutor had also suggested converting the charge from a felony to a misdemeanor for the defendants in the Golden Dawn case who have been referred for participating in the attack on Egyptian fishermen and PAME trade unionists.
In particular, regarding the 2012 attack on Egyptian fishermen in Perama, the prosecutor requested that the charge of the five defendants in this case be changed from attempted murder to serious bodily injury together.
It is recalled that one of the four foreign fishermen was seriously injured during the attack.
According to the prosecutor, “if the perpetrators had a murderous purpose, they would have carried it out. They would have persisted despite the victim’s appeals.” The perpetrators would have been careful to plan the criminal outcome differently. “
Due to the attack against PAME executives in Perama in 2013, the prosecutor once again requested the conversion of the accusation for the four defendants in the specific case. In particular, he proposed converting the charge of attempted homicide from intentional to simple and dangerous bodily harm, that is, to a misdemeanor. In fact, as he pointed out for the simple bodily injury, the criminal prosecution must be suspended conditionally.
According to the prosecutor, there was no homicide required for those accused of the attack since “if they had done so, they would have achieved their objective and people who shouted” police “or who did not have enough time would not stop them.” According to the prosecutor, “if you want to commit murder, you can do it in seconds.”
Distinguished possession of weapons
For the crime of illustrious possession of firearms (crime) suffered by some of the defendants, including Nikos Michaloliakos, Nikos Michos, Ioannis Lagos, etc. the prosecutor requested, on a case-by-case basis, that the specific crime be converted into crimes equivalent to misdemeanors.
As an indication, he proposed for N. Michaloliakos the conversion of the crime of distinguished possession of weapons into illegal possession of weapons (minor offense) while for Ilias Kasidiaris and St. Boukoura he demanded their complete acquittal.
[ad_2]
