[ad_1]
PAOK – Olympiacos: Giorgos Kouventidis was invited to comment on Sportdog’s comments on PAOK’s next moves after the appeal was rejected. The editor of the Forza newspaper exploded against the EEC, which he described as unreliable and analyzed why he considers that the Thessaloniki team was harmed. At the same time, he spoke about the transfer news and gave a report on Nea Toumba, whose subject is stuck.
Read the interview he gave:
How will PAOK move after the denial of the appeal for deduction of points for the multiple property case?
“PAOK will go to CAS. The decision to reject is wrong. At PAOK, they consider that the team was severely punished.”
Why does PAOK consider that it was harmed?
Committees made up of regular judges refuse to judge and adopt the recommendation of a committee, in which they are “shopkeepers.” He is a retired judge who turns out to be the best man in the ministry. He is an economist who has been involved in other cases that have caused great controversy, such as the case of the transfer of shares of Veria and now the last one of PAE Trikala. There are also three more attorneys. Of them there is a well-known television personality, who believes that there are 600 billion Sorras to save Greece. Among them is a lawyer who was admitted a few days before Avgenakis tried the case. No one knows what criteria these people used. Were there other candidates? We are talking about a committee of dubious credibility. In 3 days, this committee studied a package of documents that was suddenly in its possession. They read thousands of documents and made a presentation. This suggestion was adopted by regular judges, who, after refusing to consider the case, why did they sue? Because they called PAOK, Xanthi and Olympiakos since they did not get to the heart of the matter and accepted the conclusion of the committee … Avgenaki, as they say. He was cared for in a way that no one knows who he is. How these people integrate the committees that lead the guillotine groups and others (Veria absolutes 2016-17). It is interesting to note that regular judges take this committee seriously. PAOK says “I want to be judged”. Neither the EPO nor the Super League committee did. That fact must be taken into account. “
“Will he eat -7 if he doesn’t sell a chalet?”
There is a post saying that if Xanthi facilities are not selling there will be another point deduction for PAOK. How do you comment on that?
“Why is it PAOK? In other words, will PAOK eat less than 7 if Kalpazidis does not sell Sale? Firstly, because there is a misunderstanding. Kalpazidis has not taken Xanthi’s coaching staff. He has taken the Chalet and the stadiums in front him. The team coach is behind the stadium home in Pigadia, where there is no podium. So Xanthi does not train there. The one who took Sale is a relative of Savvidis. If Kalpazidis does not sell the hotel, what will PAOK do? Should we persuade Kalpazidis to sell him? The Olympians are happy that his team is winning against PAOK. Those who consider themselves PAOK opponents may be happy, because they took a hit. But what has happened, if you let go of the fans It is a shame. In essence, it weakens justice in the eyes of the citizen. Terrible things have happened. “
Recently, there were Tsimirot’s statements that they threw bridges at PAOK. Play the case?
“It just caught our eye then. Standard Liege can go bankrupt and be released. I don’t think there is a problem with PAOK.”
“10 million for Giannouli”
It was written about Giannoulis who was going to Atalanta. It is valid?
“Where is the man going with so many crown cases?” Giannoulis is for sale. If you bring an amount close to your clause, they will give it to you. PAOK is selling it for 10 million. “
“Olympiacos to another level”
Is there interest in Limnios?
“Everything that is written is very theoretical. The point is that these players will sell if they make offers. At the moment, I don’t think there is anything but rumors. In PAOK in general there is the problem that it does not sell players easily. Still He has not learned to sell. He has grown to many levels. In this part, however, he lags behind. He has to find a way to sell players. Olympiacos has opened its doors to the Champions League for 20 years and has gone to others levels. You can also buy and sell. PAOK did not advance. You cannot sell players at good prices. This is an issue that concerns the people of PAOK. “
Katranis is rumored to be on the list instead of Giannoulis. It is valid?
“It just caught our eye then. I think it has some basis. There is no practical interest for Giannoulis. If not, why should PAOK look left? In other words, he has not made progress in Katranis. He is listening a lot, but so far there are no results. “
The new Toumba that stuck?
“It just caught our eye then. Nothing has been done in Kaftantzoglio, where PAOK has to move to build Toumba. An arrangement must be made for PAOK to rent the stadium in market terms. Because according to the law and the character of the stadium, the team must pay at least 3 million euros of rent per year, when Panathinaikos and AEK play in a more modern double stage, Champions League level and they pay 1/7. Here we need an amendment that does not seem intend to do so from what we understand. And they let the matter drop. Kaftantzoglio takes 8 to 9 months to be hired from the day PAOK decides to rent it. The stadium does not meet the specifications for Super League and European matches. So that PAOK loses next season too. He can’t go there in 2020-21. As for Toumba, PAOK has advanced the entire bureaucracy. These are stuck in a public service, which underperforms d due to a pandemic. In this way, the process cannot go ahead, the plan can go to public consultation and stand in the way. PAOK handled the New Toumba issue well in terms of bureaucracy until the pandemic. Now these services don’t work and time is wasted. Even under these conditions, things could move forward. “
ALSO READ: “Huneri” Savvidis to Melissanidis and Marinakis! Greek Top Forleague “Steals”!
[ad_2]
