[ad_1]
“Arriving to Your courtI thought I was coming to a French Revolution court where there were crowds outside the hallways and they disapproved of those defending the accused. I hope your court guarantees you my physical integrity. The European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) stipulates that all accused have the right to presumption of innocence until there is an irrevocable decision. In addition, it obliges all public authorities, citizens and journalists not to report the accused as guilty. All this under tolerance of your court have been raped. There is one influence of his court, which has been made by the President of the Republic – who ruled that the Republic spoke – by all the political parties and by all the media. This influence gives us the impression that fairness is at stake of your court. Because so many factors, and with the street demonstrations, try to influence you. No proof or indication is required, mere suspicion is enough to present the request for exemption. Then we suspect it has affected you. Posters were put up in Parliament that “They are not innocent”, you will definitely see them. You will also see the announcement of the Union of Judges and Prosecutors. With your tolerance a criminal trial has become politics and that tolerance gives us the suspicion that it is a matter of applause.
“As an old lawyer, I don’t think so but everything the media praises you, the channels and the newspapers, the same newspapers turn against the prosecutor because he dared to disagree with the political establishment. All of this offends his presumption of innocence. Today the newspapers write which cells they will go to, that is discounted they will not be suspended on appeal. This is a direct violation of the ECHR and the journalistic code. His court did not notice these violations, did not see them and did not make a single statement.
“Your court is not like the lesbians you condemned, here you are not judging either fascism or democracy. We want justice to win, not democracy. THE fascism Y Nazism It is not criminal act. You could run them, I prefer this to a default decision. We do not have a trial of ideologies, you do not defeat fascism, nor is your decision historical, nor does this trial have anything to do with the Nuremberg trial. Misunderstood people are judged, no one has objection to being punished for these acts.
The prosecutor is representing at the headquarters the interests of the state, your court represents only the idea of Justice. And in this room your court has not done justice, but the political leaders came here, was your court not affected? I mean no, but I suspect you have been influenced. I can not to cheer the President of the Republic and all the dogs at the party. The ideology was not judged, but the facts.
I keep saying that ATHEX she did not enter parliament alone, but that the Greek people sent her and you turned against the Greek people for sending a criminal organization to parliament. In conclusion, I am referring to Law 4516/2019, whoever violates Law 3090, Article 8, by presumption of innocence, is punished with a penalty of up to two years and a fine of up to 2,000,000 euros. I am sure for result of this test. Unless you are Tertsetis or Polyzoides. Koutsoubas also came to speak about a criminal organization.
»Not seen by Republic President issued an announcement. And he made a decision for ATHEX. Everything is destroyed. According to the ECHR, an irrevocable decision is needed and the decisions of the Court of Appeals are not irrevocable, as illiterate journalists say, but of the Supreme Court. Ms. Mandrou, Mr. Kambourakis cannot make decisions. They fixed it yesterday and to which cells they will go. His court saw them and did nothing. We suspect that has been affected.
There is influence from all parties, from all televisions and from her. Association of Judges and Prosecutors. If not all have affected you, I am wrong. I speak of suspicion, because the law does not require proof or proof. All this world that has fallen on you and is outside, cannot stop affecting you. I mean, not that I personally believe it. There is a second. The presumption of innocence that she has been and is being raped by her omission. You are not making a statement that this is a criminal court and we are not making an ideology. Tolerate newspapers that say “democracy has won.”
»You tolerated it and the intervention of the legislature that raised banners in Parliament. I have no obligation to go against the Union of Judges and Prosecutors, the PD, all the televisions and newspapers and the motley crowd outside. I said it as a mixed crowd because Mr. Tsipras spoke about it for those who were shouting for Macedonia. You have respected the mother of a victim but nothing good was known about Katsif’s mother for both children who were murdered. These are fascists. Our thing does not suffer anything.
“These are the reasons why I ask you exception of your court, except the prosecutor “.
