[ad_1]
The Three-Member Autofocus Juvenile Court imposed a 12-month prison sentence on the EPAL teacher, who was arrested on October 23 after accusations that she was not wearing a mask in the classroom.
The court by majority found the teacher guilty of the crimes of violation of the measures against the spread of the coronavirus and the interruption of the service, recognizing the attenuation of the previous legal life.
Apologizing, the teacher stated that she had informed the school principal and students that she often removed her mask due to otitis, but taking all other measures to protect herself against coronavirus: “I would never endanger the students and my children. colleagues “.
According to the teacher, a student’s father’s complaint that he expelled him because he asked him to wear his mask is not valid. According to the defendant in court, she instructed the student to leave the room with other classmates because “they were swearing and cursing” and he had the duty to return to normality the part that “was a little jungle.”
In his testimony, the director of EPAL assured that he found out about the incident after the student’s mother went to his office to report the teacher. He also said that he asked the woman not to file a complaint, proposing to call his office and the teacher to resolve the issue. “The philologist arrived without a mask, his mother commented and my colleague left saying that he had a lesson. Then the mother made a report. I have not seen whether or not he is wearing a mask, but I have reports of the five-member and the fifteen-member that they did not wear and they abstained from their lesson. “
At the same time, the witness stressed that her colleague is an excellent scientist and teacher and that he did not want to endanger his students.
The court’s decision was in accordance with the proposal of the Court’s prosecutor, who in his speech stated that the defendant did not respect the law, even wondering if the teacher has realized the danger that exists:
“The issue is not the mask, but respect for the law. If someone applies it when they try, we lead to a society of anarchy.
The defendant constantly says “I judged, I decided, my opinion is”, that is, she says that she decided to wear a mask whenever she wanted.
As he left the audience, he followed the other measures, but judged, thought, decided not to wear a mask. He brought in an infectious disease specialist. I wonder if he still understands the danger that exists. “
Source: ΑΠΕ-ΜΠΕ
