[ad_1]
Tassos Kakos, commented in “Total Football” the refereeing of the German Tobias Stiller, in AEK-PAOK, distinguishing five phases, characterizing the three decisions as correct and both as wrong.
Detailed what he said …
Initially mentioned: “The party had five important decisions all in the AEK area. It had three right decisions and two wrong ones, but the VAR is also to blame.”
For the Sakhof hand phase: “The contact of the ball with the defender’s hand comes first from the body. The referee allowed the game to continue correctly.”
By the entrance of Sakhof on Jolis within the area: “There is a fall of the PAOK striker, there is a complaint with the defender, but the defender plays the ball clearly and the referee left the phase correctly to continue.”
For the canceled goal of Tzolis: “It is a very easy case for the VAR. The attacker’s body covered his hand, but it is a violation, although the referee did not have visual contact.” When the control was done by the BAR, the contact of the ball with the hand was visible ” .
For the fall of Zivkovic after Kristic’s marking inside the area: “The referee lost the phase of the double overthrow. The player coming from behind kicks it and overturns it and the player coming from the right overturns it. There is a double inversion. It is a clear case, I cannot understand it. The VAR does not He has an excuse to lose it. I can’t believe I didn’t inform him that there is no infraction, so the referee probably took it himself and did not indicate the penalty. It will be very interesting to see the conversations, if the head referee gives them to us. ” .
For the head of Matos and the clash with López in the area: “The attacker takes the head and then the defender hits it. It is as if the goalkeeper came out at the feet of the attacker and overturned him. This is also a clear case of sanction.” Neither the referee nor the VAR cared.
