[ad_1]
Your image AEK de Carrera, begins and ends with the appearance of Paulinho in the match with Volos. No, it is not an attempt to target a player for the problem, it is an excellent example in my opinion for the AEK problem.
Paulinho is not a player who wants to leave, he is not a player who does not have a good relationship with the coach, he is not a player that if AEK called him and offered him a contract renewal with the same money he receives today, he would say that no. . What I mean is that his appearance in the match with Volos is not explained, in any of the above reasons of indifference …
And yet you see Paulinho in the match with Volos and you wonder. And the answer is not in the already mediocre quality of the footballer. We all now know the potential of Paulinho. But you hope that in such a match he will be given the opportunity to show something, not because of the quality, but because of his mood, to justify even if a footballer writes on his tax return, a minimum effort. In vain…
Obviously Paulinho is not a good footballer, but what we saw with Volos was a child without motivation, without encouragement, without inspiration, without energy, without team spirit, without anything … It is not the unjustified red card, it is not that he has Part of the responsibility in both goals conceded by his team because he does not exert the least pressure on the one who makes the center, it is not that he does not have the least involvement in the offensive part of the game, which is supposed to be his advantage over the rest. The extreme backs of AEK, it is not that he plays permanently forgotten to the point that one wonders if he has pockets in his shorts and is looking for them to put his hands inside. It is mainly and above all that he roams the field unnecessarily and lost.
His appearance was shocking and made you wonder if anyone has ever talked to this child, if he knows what he does, if he knows where he plays, if he knows the game is for the championship, if anyone has ever tried to inspire him, to Stimulate his morals, something that makes him believe that the blood flows through him. What we call “mental preparation of a footballer” does not seem to have ever happened to this child during his days at AEK or if he did it was such a failed attempt that it did not have the slightest result, because this player is clearly, among others, an abandoned footballer. And next to him, AEK seems like a team abandoned by its coach …
In Paulinho and in his image, it seems that Carrera does not work, it is reflected that he does not work, he does not try to improve his players, to give them the motivation, the psychology, to play football, to do the basics. A coach who cannot achieve these could never change course.
So even if I’m of the opinion that Carrera should have stayed until the end of the season, I fully understand the reasons why AEK is proceeding to replace him. The AEK management does not see anything from the Italian technician and no matter how much support he offered, they proceeded to resolve the cooperation with him.
Is it just Carrera’s fault? Obviously not. AEK has a clear lack of quality in defense and has the wrong options in the summer signings. We will see Hnid in the near future, but so far he has not convinced us of anything. On the contrary, we do not need to see Insua in the future, we have seen him for years at Panathinaikos. A left back of those who come out with the kilo in Argentina and the only thing you saw in him was his passion. AEK has nothing to expect from him and as I have rewritten several times I do not know how AEK took this player … Furthermore, no right-back was acquired, nor was a replacement for Barça. So these problems are not from Carrera, but from AEK and Ilia Ivic’s management. I don’t know what the responsibility ratio is on each side, but Ivic is a great personality to tolerate interference in his work. If there are, it shouldn’t allow it or it shouldn’t be there. If he went back to making decisions like Insua’s, then he bears a large share of responsibility for Carrera’s failure.
And since I have rewritten the squad of this AEK with the exception of the problem in two positions in defense, it is in my opinion superior to that of AEK that won the last championship and without a doubt more complete and with more options, so the failure is becomes even greater for those who run the team …
But leaving yesterday behind and going to tomorrow, honestly what I have to say is that when I read in the gazzetta that Jiménez is the favorite, I thought it was trolling, it did not cross my mind that it is real news. I did not imagine that the management of AEK or Ivic, thought to bring Manolo back to his bench and I cannot understand the criteria of this choice.
Not only the logic of football, but any sense of logic stops at this choice. He confirms that AEK is not abandoned on the pitch, but in general that no one has plans or vision for the team, that no one has dreamed of anything for him beyond the new stadium. That nobody has imagined the least and does not plan the team they want to see enter the new stadium. And this is clearly a bigger and worse problem, than the lack of a plug or a left back or a coach …
[ad_2]
