[ad_1]
The extreme limits of inhumanity at one’s expense 85 years old, are registered through the pages of a areopagic decision: A neighbor of the old woman, although she agreed to take care of her, not only left her helpless, but also rushed to look for her money and jewelry, after her death …
According to the decision of the Criminal Department of the Supreme Court, the The 85-year-old man faced serious health problems. and in fact in July 2014 he fainted and was transferred to a state hospital hospital, where he was diagnosed with metastatic abdominal cancer, urinary tract infection, and poor kidney function.
Following his discharge from the hospital in early July 2014, He agreed with a woman who lived in the same apartment building., but on another floor (with which he was not related) with her takes care and for her candies since he could no longer support himself, or even get out of bed.
However, the woman who promised to take care of the 85-year-old man did not give him the attention he needed “Although he had a special legal obligation to do so due to his agreement with the latter and, in particular, he did not request medical help and did not provide medical attention for the treatment of the patient’s ulcers, as well as to coordinate her transfer to a hospital or another institution, where cleaning conditions would be better and there would be the possibility of immediate medical and pharmaceutical attention “, reports the areopagites. Two months later, in the second ten days of 2014, the old woman passed away at home.
However, according to the testimonies of people who lived in the same apartment building, it appears that the living conditions of the deceased in the house where she lived, during the period in which the woman in question cared for her, were “Miserable and dangerous for your health.”
In particular, as he testified witnesses, who had repeatedly visited the apartment of the deceased from July 2014 until a few days before her death, “The environment in her house was dirty, there was an unbearable stench, the sheets on the bed, where she was constantly lying, were dirty and full of dark liquids and blood, and the mattress on the bed was full of dirt.”
According to Areopagite’s decision, the 85 years He got “He suffered from pressure ulcers in both countries of the heel, mainly he did not suffer ulcers in the spine at the height of the sacrum to such a depth that the sacrum is exposed”, and the woman who had assumed the obligation to care, on the one hand did not fulfill it during “Immediate treatment in the hospital, and on the other hand, keep the layer on which his injured body was clean and free of germs, thus preventing and neutralizing the dangerous situation already created that threatened his health but accepting the resulting danger.”
As pointed out areopagites: That is, the dying woman lived in an environment full of dirt germs, posing a causally serious risk of infecting her body, while in combination with the fact that she was almost permanently lying in bed under these dirty conditions, A serious danger to his health was indeed created, which was manifested, according to his medical record, with the appearance of bed sores in the regions of the heel of both feet and in the sanctuary, to the point that the sacred bone it is exposed due to the depth of the ulcer.
Therefore, due to the dirt and germs in the environment of the deceased’s home, in combination with her immobility in bed, from which she could not move on her own due to her state of health (she had metastatic cancer in the abdomen), the previous causal damage to your health (bedsores) “.
If the woman who had cared for her 85 years and had proceeded to “The due actions would have eliminated the state of danger described for his health, which caused the aforementioned injuries (ulcers).”
In fact, in a home search carried out by the Police at the home of the woman who had treated the elderly woman the jewels were found and confiscated, but also money of the 85-year-old deceased and those confiscated by court decision were handed over to her heirs.
Finally, the woman who had taken care of the old woman pleaded guilty for the crime of exposure to danger and was sentenced to one year in prison, with a three-year suspension. He appealed to the Supreme Court against the verdict, but it was rejected.
News Today:
Everything you need to know about self-assessments: who deserves it, for which categories it is required
A respite before the retail opening: how it will work on Monday
The Infectious Disease War: Background to the Meetings
See all the latest news from Greece and the world, as it happens, on Protothema.gr
