[ad_1]
At the beginning of the hearing, the headquarters prosecutor in the Golden Dawn trial, Adamantia Oikonomou, gave her own response, requesting the speech on yesterday’s intervention by President Lepeniotis for the suspension of sentences.
Despite the fact that yesterday María Lepenioti raised issues of the utmost importance for the credibility and impartiality of the prosecutor, challenging her proposal on suspensions, Mrs. Oikonomou remained impassive in her position, which had provoked the ire of Civil Education and society .
In fact, during her statement, the prosecutor spoke of “unknown”, as she said, characterizations by the defenders of Civil Action, arguing that perhaps she does not like their proposals, but that they are based exclusively on the law and their conscience. .
“Lagos did not violate the restrictive conditions”
Adamantia Oikonomou insisted to her employer that the execution of the sentence for those convicted be suspended, despite the uproar that was generated. 
It was preceded by the reading of a document on the basis of which a resolution on MEP Lagos was issued, which was requested by the headquarters yesterday. Court 1184/2015 was referred to the Court, in whose reasoning it is stated that the accused failed on three occasions to comply with the restrictive conditions that had been imposed on him in June 2015, for which he was temporarily detained.
After the parliament reading, the headquarters prosecutor, Adamantia Oikonomou, asked to speak. “Regarding the questions they asked at yesterday’s meeting and in order not to create ambiguities and misinterpretations, I want to say the following,” he said, and then began to analyze the current code, explaining why he made the specific proposal.
“I say this because at the meeting yesterday you addressed me, telling me if you were proposing the suspension despite the relapse,” he added.
As for Giannis Lagos, the prosecutor stated that the restrictive conditions were lifted, but then new parliaments were issued that ruled that the defendant for the violation of the conditions was convinced that he was not violating the conditions, provided that his temporary detention was replaced again for restrictive conditions. “What a misunderstanding there was on the part of the district attorney when the judicial councils twice ruled differently!” he said.
The location of Michaloliakos
As for Nikos Michaloliakos, the prosecutor referred to an earlier decision from 1979 at the age of 22.
30 years have passed and it is about the possession of explosive devices. It should be noted that this is not a position as reported in the media, “he said, defending his proposal to suspend his sentence.
Intervention of the unrepentant Kasidiaris
As soon as the presidency took place, Elias Kasidiaris entered the courtroom and took a seat far behind his other co-defendants who are present.
When announcing his name, the former MP said: “I am present and would like to speak after the names are announced.”
Then, taking the floor, he seemed unrepentant, repeating that he was innocent and stating that his life had been ruined by a crime with which he had nothing to do. “I declare my innocence, the crime is dishonorable to my personality,” he said.
“I agree with the proposal of the Prosecutor’s Office for the offensive crime of the criminal organization,” said the convicted person for leading and participating in a criminal organization Kasidiaris.
He denounced government intervention
Later, the former “right-hand man” of Michaloliakos claimed that there is government interference in the trial and even claimed that he has evidence in this regard.
“I have a statement to make while filing a new item that exists in the case file but has escaped the attention of the court. It is a crucial and shocking fact that must be considered even at this stage of the trial. There are very critical and illegal government interventions in this case. So there is a new element and I turn to the lifting of the telephone secret that took place before the night of the murder. A telephone number appears repeatedly, which is associated with a senior government official of the then government of Samaras, belongs to the General Secretariat for the Coordination of Government Projects and is attributed to Dimitrios Vartzopoulos, who is the secret of the then Prime Minister Ant . Samara “.
This man spoke to a person who had a telephone conversation with the confessor on the night of the murder two days later. This person has constant communications. I have indexed them from the file, I ask that the case be clarified even now. “The court has an obligation,” he said.
He concluded: “I ask this man to come to court to explain what he was saying to the man who was speaking to the perpetrator. I request the questioning of myself with Vartzopoulos Dimitrios. I do not prejudge anything. There are specific facts here.”
[ad_2]
