[ad_1]
Important developments in the context of judicial investigations into the murder fire in the eye, which killed 102 people, are expected in the immediate future after the request filed today with the investigator investigating the case of the deadly fire Ath. Marneris the widow Fytrou, that she lost her husband and two minor children in the fiery hell of July 2018.
Through your attorney Vassilis Kapernarou, the Lady Φύτρου Citing new information that emerged during questioning, he asks Mr. Marner Submit a new request to the Prosecutor’s Office for additional prosecution in the degree of serious crime, in accordance with article 250 para. 2 of the CPC. It should be noted that this new data was brought to light by protothema.gr last Saturday.
In particular, these are elements that are in the hands of the researcher and from which it emerges, among other things, how some “pesky” airplane flight logs record that frustrating day and presented false data for the moment the air combat took off. It is characteristic that in the extinguishing diary on the day of the fire it was added with a different graphic note that 37 launches were made in Neos Voutzas! Addition, which was denied to the investigator, by the firefighters in charge of the recording task.
According to your request Mrs. Fytrou the above items with the “forged inscription” highlight the element of deception and not negligence and imply criminal liability “for both the counterfeiter and the Commander of the Air Service of the Fire Brigade (if it is not the same natural person), who subsequently confirmed the genuine signature of those listed in the Service’s agenda. “Note that the Commander He is already being prosecuted for the deadly fire and now, in accordance with the request submitted to the investigator, he acted deceitfully that day.
Likewise, in the request to Mr. Marner and based on the new data that emerged from the investigative investigation, it is stated that the day of the fire “Everyone knew the situation beforehand, they had the opportunity to order helicopters and planes to take off, but they didn’t, accepting the fatal outcome of the imminent danger that they had already identified.”.
In these circumstances, the side of the widow Fytros poses the following questions in its request to the investigator:
“-By” negligence “, did all of the above acted, who recorded false takeoff times of the helicopters to cover their responsibilities?”
– By “negligence”, the GP, while guiding his young visitor, falsified the YEMPS diary?
-Did they “negligently” make false entries in the General Staff newspaper?
“Due to ‘negligence’, did you take charge of deleting the phone calls and their content from the ESKE recorder with respect to 07.23.2018?”
Unjustified refusal
Likewise, in the request of the widow Fytros to the investigator, who has already presented a request to the Prosecutor’s Office on two occasions to improve the accusation, there is talk of an unjustified rejection of these requests by the prosecutor. This is because the prosecution did not provide an adequate and reasoned response to any of the new questions raised by the investigator, according to Fytrou.
Read in detail the request submitted to the investigator by Ms. Fytrou through Mr. Kapernaros.
News Today:
“Alarm” in Patras in view of the feast of Agios Andreas – Mitsotakis: observe the measurements
On the streets of the Athens electric bus: Which route did you try?
Investment in Elliniko Moves Fast – New Cooperation Between Lamda Development and TEMES
