Fire from a renowned lawyer: “Mars will hardly be justified in CAS”



[ad_1]

Paris Atlamazoglou analyzed the data on the case of Mars and its punishment by FIFA.

It will be very difficult for Aris to qualify for CAS and to reverse FIFA’s decision on the Durmisai transfer case. The lawyer Paris Atlamazoglou analyzed the data of the case in Metropolis 95.5, clarifying that the new punishment of Aris is different from the one imposed on him due to the pending financial problems towards the old players.

Atlamazoglou emphasized that FIFA has changed its regulations regarding the AFM change starting in 2018, on which the claims of Siston and the other players were based. At the same time, he emphasized that the current sentence will be difficult to revoke, since it is a violation by Aris, with the transfer of Durmisai, the initial punishment imposed by the World Federation. At the same time, she referred to the responsibilities of the EPO, which wanted to facilitate the “yellows”, but was also punished.

Details of Paris Atlamazoglou’s statements:

“We have to make it clear that this penalty is different from the previous transfer ban for outstanding financial players last November. The first fine could be removed if old debts were paid or if there was a settlement while the second imposes the known fine for the next two transfer periods The legal framework changed in 2018. To point out that there is a difference in relation to AEK: the cases that AEK had been tried until 2016, while from May 2018 onwards, the regulation of FIFA has changed and states that the new PAEs are called to pay even for the old PAE debts. With these data, came the decision of the four FIFA soccer players, because they went to FIFA after 2018, “he said initially.

On how this bomb decision came about: “The Siston case came to an end in 2013 and until November 2019 the player did not appear to be taking any steps to claim his money.” Apparently, his request was filed after May 2018, and the FIFA Disciplinary Committee issued a decision, which cannot be contested in any way, and the 21-day limit has been exceeded. This case has become irrevocable and cannot be challenged anywhere. For the second decision, Aris may pass the CAS or the FIFA Appeals Committee, but, as he has made known, he will appeal to the CAS. Aris will have to file an appeal with CAS in 21 days from the time he receives full reasoning for the decision. The decision issued yesterday is immediately enforceable, meaning that the team cannot make a transfer in the next two transfer periods, while Fiorin Durmisai’s ticket is also revoked. “

CFor the evaluation of the result of the decision: “If Aris wins, the second ban will be lifted. However, I think it will be very difficult to accept an appeal to CAS. I say this because Mars will demand that the disciplinary decision be reversed. However, Mars was accused of violating a decision. According to FIFA violated what they had asked him to do with the November decision. Based on these data, how easy is it to overturn such a decision? “

For the responsibilities of the EPO: “In my opinion, the EPO wanted to serve Mars, it did poorly and it turned out that the international federations are not playing.” The decision it issues must be respected. In fact, the operational part of the decision gives instructions for its implementation. There is no ignorance. The EPO has grown accustomed to surprises in the past. What FIFA and UEFA say does not apply. The EPO took a risk, knowing that there could be consequences. And the consequences are now unbearable. Circulars and all decisions are notified to all parties. In the federation there is a special section for foreign affairs. I needed to know the details of what to do. “

On whether this affects other teams or if you can open the Aeolus bag: “Foreign players appeal to foreign bodies, to FIFA, while Greeks to nationals, but the decisions and regulations established by FIFA are directly applicable to the federations belonging to it, so the EPO must implement what FIFA stipulates. ” unless the regulations provide otherwise. With this decision, FIFA wants to cut the fashion that the teams changed AFM to save existing debts. It can clearly affect other teams in the future. “

At last. on whether Mars can proceed with the renovations: “With the decision as it is, Aris cannot transfer, free players and turn amateur players into professionals. I cannot be sure of the renewals, it should be mentioned in the decision.”



[ad_2]