[ad_1]
It was not a decent traditional, predictable, and etiquette debate. Conservatives and liberals have already agreed that the first supposedly high-quality debate between the two US presidential candidates set the landfill on fire. And the public was drowned in toxic fumes.
Of offensive offense and boastful president trump viewers did not have high expectations for courteous behavior and compliance.
He used rhetoric, as the saying goes, to confront unfounded speculation, legitimize an angry hate group, threaten authoritarianism, and intimidate the electorate. In short, he poured a lot of fresh salt on the wounds he had opened. To his credit, in the face of Trump’s barrage of verbal arbitrariness, his opponent Joe Biden did not “fumble.” He controlled her.
But the one who literally lost all control was the moderator of the debate. Veteran television journalist Chris Wallace turned out to be the weak link in the 90 minute debate. She seemed unable to locate the abandoned elephant in the room. Worse, allowing the president to wander, he brought in his nervous nephew trying to calm down his drunken barber who did not get off the bar of a derailed train.
Watch the video of the first Trump-Biden debate:
It is quite risky to consider that the 73-year-old moderate journalist Fox channel made an advance on Trump. On the other hand, his experience did not allow so much shyness towards the enraged president that he violated any notion of elementary dialogue. In any case, he is not included among the cheerful cheerleaders who applaud Trump’s harassment, like other “authoritarian” colleagues.
After all, they had recent skirmishes with Trump. The president had repeatedly slandered him on Twitter, calling him “annoying, vicious, vicious,” noting that he “will never look like his father.” For his part, the journalist accused the president of participating in “the most direct and continuous attack on press freedom in the history of the United States.”
Is son of famous journalist Mike Wallace, who died in 2012. Media personality and one of the original correspondents of CBS’s 60 Minutes program, who in his 50-year career interviewed, among others, personalities such as Deg Xiaoping, Barbara Streisand, Yasser Arafat, Salvador Dali. However, his young shoot is not considered to have grown, and obviously did not make a career, in the shadow of his father.
His parents divorced when he was a baby. He grew up in Chicago under the care of his mother. Norma Cafan and his father, Bill leonard journalist who later became president of CBS News. His father came back to life when he was 14 years old after his eldest son Peter, Chris’s brother, fell off a cliff and was killed on a trip to Greece. But young Wallace’s true spiritual father is the iconic anchor Walter Cronkite from CBS Network, with whom he took his first steps in television journalism.
A Harvard graduate, after a long stint at NBC and 14 years at ABC, he switched to Fox in 2003. With a unique style of investigative journalism and a smart look behind his big square glasses, he attracted a large audience. Since then he has enjoyed public recognition as a serious, trustworthy and calm journalist who treats his interviewees harshly but fairly as the host of the Fox News Sunday program. Inside and outside the study, he has received and harshly interrogated Obama, Putin and Trump himself, whom he crushed with his questions.
And of course he got the baptism of fire in the 2016 presidential debate when he coordinated the third and last confrontation between him at the University of Nevada in Las Vegas. Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton. Admittedly, as the first chief anchor for “conservative” Fox News to host a presidential debate, he had done well then. Democrats also praised him. Actor George Clooney, despite his hatred for Fox News, invited Wallace to stay at his home on Lake Como.
But those moons the controversies were not so polarized. Which allowed him, before Hurricane Trump, to declare that “the debate is not a television program. “It is part of the constitutional rights that help millions of citizens decide who they will choose as their next president.”
How he “pushed” her now in the first debate this year in Cleveland, Ohio, pretending that the problem in the 90-minute show was not 100% due to the provocative Trump, is for many an unsolved mystery. Apparently, the presidential pressure on the panel discussion and the supposedly upright Wallace, father of six, was unbearable. But he, as an old caravan, has shown that he is not a “chicken” of the current government. For his critics, however, his attitude was explainable. Especially when it’s time to start.
A member of the Democratic Party, although he has occasionally voted for Republican candidates in local elections, Wallace has always been careful not to expose his preferences and beliefs. He always claimed that he had ensured his journalistic independence. Therefore, as an impartial, he was not a fan of any favorite or outsider. Only he is selected as a referee in a boxing match and he also has a boss. In this case, the tough Fox channel, known for its reckless, eyebrows and its role as a communication button for the current president of the United States.
The moderate moderator of the first debate can be wrongly accused of this professional connection. After all, in the chaos created by the uncontrollable Trump himself, he had no yellow card or something more drastic like a shocking teaser to calm him down. His pent-up urges to comply were wasted. Like all the debate, because the usual Wallace preferred not only to be “invisible” but also to surrender in front of the cameras in an ineffective exercise.
News Today
Nagorno-Karabakh: Struggles for Day 4, Hundreds Killed and Diplomatic Suspense
Mitsotakis: the light of the 21st century embraces the Acropolis
Koronovios: alarm and strict restrictions in the villages of Boeotia and Evia