Boloni “put” them in charge – They … pushed him to leave! (see)



[ad_1]

Panathinaikos were beaten by PAOK in Toumba (2-1) and Stelios Bitsoris commented on the performance of Laszlo Boloni’s players.

“All Green TV”: every Monday, from 21:00 to 23:00, the best Panathinaikos program, live on your screens, here!

XENOPOULES: He has a clear responsibility in the first goal that his team concedes, after seeing the ball passing through his area without intervening. Sample of inexperience, on the part of the young goalkeeper. He also had some very big surgeries.
SCORE: 5.5

SANCHES: He did not perform as well as in previous games. Creatively he was unable to help his team, while on defense he faced some problems.
SCORE: 5

SCHENKEFELD: Throughout the unacceptable defensive performance of his team, he gave some solutions to the problems created by his players. PAOK. Otherwise, the score could have been different.
SCORE: 5.5

POUGOURAS: Bad. He could not win duels, he constantly lost his player, something that happened in phase 2-1. It seems for a long time that he does not press anything well when he is fighting.
SCORE: 4

HUANCAR: Preferred instead Zagariti and did not justify his coach at any time during the game. His side was the joy of his attackers PAOK, after having put it on the “target”.
SCORE: 4

ΒΕΛΕΘ: He was called up to play as a six, a position he obviously doesn’t know how to play properly. Uncertain passes, which gave the opponents the right to claim the ball. Bad game of the Spanish who did not help his team anywhere.
SCORE: 4

MAURICIO: It was not bad Brazilian, but I couldn’t do more. He had a hard time helping him develop his team and did not have the best possible cooperation with him. Βέλεθ. He made some efforts to “build” something good and was constantly running the length and breadth of the field.
SCORE: 5.5

VIGIAFANES: It was not the same as in previous games. The utter irritation that his team had helped in this. He couldn’t create many dangerous situations. He ran, he was active, quite consistent defensively, but not giving much of what he could.
SCORE: 5

HATZIGIOVANIS: Useless in many of your efforts. He did a lot of sprints but they didn’t have much of an effect. He could have scored, but the ineffectiveness that distinguishes him did not allow him to do so.
SCORE: 4

AUTHOR: He gave the team hope when the game closed. From that moment on, he was unable to do many things and with the passage of time his performance decreased.
SCORE: 6

MAKENTA: You may not have scored, but your overall performance in Tuba it was positive. Of your own help Aitor scored while very mobile. It was taken to extremes, but also further back and in general it was positive and with a lot of passion.
SCORE: 6

KARLITOS: He came into the game as a backup and was trying to become a threat to him. PAOK based on your technical training and your passion. He didn’t have much help “doing” something good, as big balls were the tactic of choice.
SCORE: 4.5

IOANNIDIS: Another for whom he launched the battle or Bologna. He had a good time with a header, while also being the first player to push the first pass from the home team players.
SCORE: 5

ALEXANDROPOULOS: He was upset and so chose not to start in the starting lineup. He entered the game at a point where Panathinaikos it had a completely unorthodox way and not a clear way of creating.
SCORE: 5

BOUZOUKIS: He couldn’t really help with his entry into the game. He had some great passes and some duels that he won, but so far.
SCORE: 4.5

EMMANOUILIDIS: Apart from an individual effort that caused a foul, not even the young winger was able to change anything for his team. However, it was quite combative.
SCORE: 4.5

Read more…



[ad_2]