[ad_1]
Even if the wolf got old … Their MEP Stelios Kouloglou had warned them from the tvxs website with an article “I knew I had you first”, in which he criticized SYRIZA’s behavior in the media and ESR, writing: ” The Stalinist logic of ‘those who are not with us are against us’ has only created enemies. “
But severe knowledge is not the same as SYRIZA. Yesterday at the meeting of the Parliamentary Commission for Institutions and Transparency, he raised his confidence in the president of the ESR, Athanasios Karamanos, and demanded his resignation. The reason is that it says it does not guarantee pluralism, something that is not the responsibility of the news editor.
On television, however, the vengeful representatives of SYRIZA are always present. What should KINAL and the KKE say?
SYRIZA’s dark Stalinism has always hated the media when they couldn’t control the news and direct their commentary.
During his anti-memory and governmental period, he targeted the media and journalists. Insults on social networks, embargo of TV programs and stations, derogatory complaints and shameful characterizations against journalists, in order to completely discredit the profession, and therefore journalistic criticism of their ads and actions.
They wanted their journalists to submit. These were the “popular journalists-activists”, those “dedicated to informing the people”, the “progressives”, the “valid ones”, those “beyond all suspicion as to the truth of their speech”. The others were the “henchmen of the chiefs”, the “servants”, the “servants”.
By the way, the SYRIZA culture had penetrated the journalistic world itself. The ESIEA Disciplinary Council had invited journalists who were openly and openly in favor of the “yes” vote in the referendum. This was not supposed to be her role. But none of those who with the same audacity and audacity propagated the “no”. They were obviously fulfilling their role!
The role that SYRIZA had reserved in the information was evident in the saying of the then government deputy Olga Gerovasilis in 2016, who affirmed that it is the government’s right to indicate on the channels that they will inform the citizens “especially when this practice hides convenience.”
The then government spokesman had fired them because they did not interrupt his program to promote the… significant (and ultimately meaningless) meeting of the “leaders of the South” that Tsipras had called in Zappeion. He accused them of “preferring to do reruns and cooking shows” (that is, the government, in addition to being the editor-in-chief, also claimed the role of program director for the channels.
It was the time of the epic Nikos Pappas who had discovered the Institute of Florence, who had given the opinion that only four channels fit on the Greek frequencies. (What can now say the “scientists” of the Institute that can fit more than four?).
Before and after the nightly encounters between Tsipras and Psycharis in front of the Himalayan cat, in order to take over the DOL, Kalogritsa’s appeal to Marinakis for a loan of 20 million for the delivery of the TV license, the pastures of the same applicants. his involvement with the construction of CCC for the bogus projects in Abu Dhabi, with money destined for the creation of a canal (all as he says after SYRIZA insists).
The complaint from Alpha owner Dimitris Kontominas has also remained monumental. On the “air” of his channel in an entertainment program, he claimed that they wanted to take political control of the station. She specifically said: Her man came over and said “you will give me 51%.” I say what more do you want? He says: “I want four political programs a week, to have them.” I’m not saying anything else, will you? “I also want control of the news.” I say, go with my good boy, nothing is for sale.
Clearly, the information of the channels suffers many times, since since their creation they are primarily rendered to the printing and dramatization of the news, and secondarily to political conveniences (which also exist).
But it is not the job of the ESR and much more of any party to evaluate and determine the news. It is the job of journalists.
