Enraged at Panathinaikos: “Definition of red!” (Photo)



[ad_1]

Panathinaikos managed to lose in Faliro to a “missing” Olympiakos who, apart from a few moments, was walking on the field. Stelios Bitsoris comments on the performance of Laszlo Boloni’s footballers.

“All Green TV”: every Monday, from 21:00 to 23:00, the best Panathinaikos program, live on your screens, here!

DIOUDIS: He couldn’t have done anything better in the goal he scored Olympic. In the few phases in which he was called in to help his team, it was positive.
SCORE: 6

SCHENKEFELD: He only played for a while, since a discomfort he felt did not allow him to continue playing the second. He had no major problems, since Olympic I was fighting without for
SCORE: 6

POUGOURAS: It had some problems in some phases, but again it was not so bad. In the replay the hosts never threatened and put more emphasis on passing the ball.
SCORE: 5

SANCHES: Certainly not the best. Defensively he had problems, since Olympic especially in the first part he hit from the side of his responsibility. Aggressive, it cannot be said that he did not try, but his quality is not such that the Panathinaikos to be victorious.
SCORE: 4

ZAGARITIS: The young man who was selected for the left wing had a difficult task. He carried on his shoulder the mark of the always dangerous Rangelovic and he did well. In general, he had a very good image in the game both on defense and offense, since with many raises and balls to his home Σα I was trying something good
SCORE: 6.5

KOURBELIS: Disappointing picture in the first half. Its “loaded” center Olympic made life very difficult for him. He always had to face more than one opponent, while in the first pass of the defense to him the exact same thing happened, so he lost control. In the second half he played as central defender, but Olympiakos’ provocative backhand helped him play an informal six.
SCORE: 4.5

MAURICIO: Your image is bad Brazilian in the first half. your choice Martins loading the core made it quite difficult. On replay he increased his performance, with the result that Panathinaikos to spin the ball and have full control. If in that counterattack he did not lose the ball from … lying down Refineries, your score would be much better.
SCORE: 6

HATZIGIOVANIS: It could be said that his appearance in Faliro was the least disappointing. Bad decisions in the goal phase, he has lost a very critical header and in general he has had very bad decisions. Except for a good time when he was defeated by Σα his racing image was well below average.
SCORE: 3

HUANCAR: He was called to fight in a position that he knows very well, since in Spain he often played across the line or in front of the winger. The lack of rhythm was evident. He tried to sound useful, but to no avail. Many nerves and a yellow card his account.
SCORE: 4

KARLITOS: It didn’t look particularly good in the game. Certainly in the first part the whole team did not help at all. On replay one will remember a head, rejected Σα, but he was in an offside position, so he wouldn’t count a masterpiece ball in Hatzigiovanni. Some things about him Spanish.
SCORE: 4

MAKENTA: Same here. Annoying Libra – Always rational, easily hurt emotionally, very passionate, and maybe a little too intense Italian wandering aimlessly through the grass. The culmination of his nonexistence in recent games is the phase of impermanence that he lost in an empty home.
SCORE: 2.5

SAVE: The first move from the bench was the Portuguese. Some things in the middle that Olympic he was not in the field. He left after a heavy blow.
SCORE: 4

ALEXANDROPOULOS: Probably the best in the field. Really great aspect of the young midfielder, who when entering the field sewed and unleashed in the midfield. Many stops for suspected counterattacks, great decisions, a lot of passion and in general an image that every footballer with the green jersey should have.
SCORE: 7.5

VIGIAFANIES: Possibly he too could have started in the starting lineup, having more clearance behind. Charlie Brown and provide assistance to Kourbeli, Mauricio. His entry proved his quality, as after many of his own shots or Panathinaikos it could become threatening. Very good or Argentinian that brought out the passion.
SCORE: 6.5

MOLO: He struggled for a few minutes. In the time he was on the grass he had good transfers up to that point.
SCORE: 5

Read more…



[ad_2]