[ad_1]
Many spoke of the “achievement” of Chrysochoidis, commenting that SYRIZA, KKE and MERA 25, signed a joint text by the Polytechnic, on the occasion of the anti-democratic ban on rallies throughout the country, which evoked memories of dark times.
It was not an “achievement” or a surprise, it was an obvious act, since it is evident that there was no will on the part of the government to seek a consensual solution to the celebration, observing all sanitary measures.
On the contrary, the anniversary was instrumentalized with a double purpose:
1) In case of a mass march, blame parties and organizations for being crowded during a pandemic
2) Through repression to satisfy those who for years have wanted to abolish the celebration of the anniversary of the uprising of the Polytechnic.
The attempt on Saturday night, with a decision, which is controlled as unconstitutional, to return to the state of gendarmerie, is a sign of authoritarianism, ideology and arrogance and naturally led to the common text, which demands the obvious: respect for the democracy.
One would expect that all the forces that are positioned in the progressive space have a common position.
Therefore, it is difficult to understand the position of the Movement for Change, which chose, as it said, “not to participate in frontal movements”, so as not to contribute to polarization.
It is questionable when it is time to participate in frontal movements, if not at the time when undemocratic decisions are made, which, as KINAL himself points out, remind us of “We decide and we order.”
As with the simple analogy and the bill of demonstrations, the Movement for Change, with its position, makes a historical mistake, since it does not seem to clash with the right on key political issues.
Even with political cynicism to see it, the decision is not explained, since the impression is re-created “why should I vote for KINAL, I go directly to Mitsotakis”.
A prisoner of those who occasionally aspire to a position in the current government (many do not even hide it), KINAL is unable to fulfill the principles that it now invokes only on the anniversaries of PASOK and Andreas Papandreou.
Before Evangelos Venizelos made PASOK a follower of Samaras and especially of Andreas Papandreou’s PASOK, he would not only sign a joint text in defense of the Republic, he would even write it.
This PASOK, and not the one on the right, is the one that has buried and commemorated the Movement for Change. With “absences” like yesterday, he even seems to be dancing on his grave. In reality, however, it retains its own purpose.
[ad_2]
