[ad_1]
The time is approaching for judicial decisions on whether or not to grant suspensive status to the conviction of gold prospectors convicted of joining and running a criminal organization.
The trial will continue on Thursday with the requests filed by Elias Kasidiaris and Giannis Lagos, with the first denouncing government interference in the trial and the second asking to be investigated who ordered his arrest at the airport, trying to save as much time as possible.
Despite the fact that on Tuesday Maria Lepenioti raised issues of the utmost importance for the prosecutor’s credibility and impartiality, challenging her proposal for suspensions, Adamantia Oikonomou remained impassive in her position, which had provoked the ire of Civil Education and society.
Parliament 1184/2015 was referred to the court today, in whose reasoning it is stated that the convicted MEP did not meet the restrictive conditions imposed on him in June 2015 on three occasions, for which he was temporarily detained.
The prosecutor is immobile
During her statement, the prosecutor spoke of “unknown”, as she said, characterizations of the Civil Action lawyers, arguing that they may not like their proposals, but are based exclusively on the law and on their conscience.
In fact, he insisted on his arguments that the execution of the sentence for those convicted be suspended, despite the uproar that was generated.
As for Giannis Lagos, the prosecutor stated that the restrictive conditions were lifted, but then new parliaments were issued that ruled that the defendant for the violation of the conditions was convinced that he was not violating the conditions, provided that his temporary detention was replaced again for restrictive conditions. “What a misunderstanding there was on the part of the district attorney when the judicial councils twice ruled differently!” he said.
Kasidiari’s complaints after guilt
Elias Kasidiaris was provocative again, claiming that his life had been ruined by a crime with which he had nothing to do, while claiming that he was drafting “the prosecutor’s proposal for the offensive crime of the criminal organization.”
Later, the former “right-hand man” of Michaloliakos claimed that there is government interference in the trial and even claimed that he has evidence in this regard.
“I have a statement to make while filing a new item that exists in the case file but has escaped the attention of the court. It is a crucial and shocking fact that must be considered even at this stage of the trial. There are very critical and illegal government interventions in this case. So there is a new element and I turn to the lifting of the telephone secret that took place before the night of the murder. A telephone number appears repeatedly, which is associated with a senior government official of the then government of Samaras, belongs to the General Secretariat for the Coordination of Government Projects and is attributed to Dimitrios Vartzopoulos, who is the secret of the then Prime Minister Ant . Samara “. 
This man spoke to a person who had a telephone conversation with the confessor on the night of the murder two days later. This person has constant communications. I have indexed them from the file, I ask that the case be clarified even now. “The court has an obligation,” he said.
He concluded: “I ask this man to come to court to explain what he was saying to the man who was speaking to the perpetrator. I request the questioning of myself with Vartzopoulos Dimitrios. I do not prejudge anything. There are specific facts here.”
The irony of Lagos
The lawyer for G. Lagos conveyed to the headquarters the gratitude of his client who believes that the manipulations of the court will help him justify himself in the European Courts to which he will appeal.
G. Lagos’ second lawyer read in court a statement from his client, which spoke of “judicial error” regarding the “alleged violation of restrictive terms”, citing the parliaments that followed the 2015 parliament.
The seat has already responded that parliaments do not function as a Court of Appeal and certainly do not replace the second with the first.
The lawyer asked to investigate who ordered G. Lagos to stop at the airport, as well as to read the statements of G. Lagos (from a video) who says that if he is convicted and not suspended, he will be here to serve his sentence.
Michaloliakou Defense: He had a newspaper and closed it
The arguments of the defense of Nikos Michaloliakos for the attempt to obtain the suspension of the sentence of the leader of Chrysi Avgi set those present in court back years. 
“There is sanctity of the accused. They also slandered. For that minor crime of 41 years ago for Michaloliakos. Resorting to such an old wrong decision shows his weakness, his lack of argumentation. The crime was committed at the age of 19.
They said it was an explosion. He was not charged with bombing or attempting to bomb a Russian cinema as heard. This is your mud. Michaloliakos, now 63, is entitled to suspension.
The decision is in the first instance. We must respect the decision and the rights of the accused. If you serve your sentence, high school will be worthless. He has no activity, he had a newspaper and he closed it ”.
Kampagiannis: the court rejected the prosecutor’s distortion
Thanassis Kampagiannis, a civil trial attorney in the Golden Dawn trial, speaks of a sober and procedurally flawless response by the president and judges to the methodical attempt to conceal and distort documents and evidence.
As he points out, the dispute between the lawyers in the civil lawsuit did not refer to the sentence of the headquarters prosecutor, Adamantia Oikonomou, but “to the obscuring and distortion of critical documents, in a way that does not correspond to a prosecutor but”.
“Fortunately, the βη court inevitably conducted its own investigation into the existence of the ‘false event’ that requires the crime of defamation and that we allegedly disseminated,” said Kampagiannis, adding that “what emerged at the hearing fully justifies our statements.” and annul the “slanderous complaints” that the headquarters prosecutor unjustifiably repeated. “
[ad_2]
