[ad_1]
The confrontation between ND and SYRIZA for the post-Golden Dawn era is leading in dangerous directions. Following the court ruling on Wednesday and while the court’s verdict on the sentences is still pending By imposing themselves on the members of the neo-Nazi criminal organization, the two parties lead an unprecedented confrontation where in the end the only result is the joint laundering of the Golden Dawn and the transaction of the dominant political system with the neo-Nazis all the previous years.
What is the advisability of the ND-SYRIZA showdown?
In fact, many doubts are raised about the convenience of this controversy in bipartisan principle, given that it could influence, as an adjunct and within the framework of the new penal code, on the influence of the court to dictate caresses to goldsmiths, penalties that should not correspond to the maximum penalties. imposed for his heinous crimes.
It is recalled that the announcement of the sentences was scheduled for last Thursday, however it was postponed to Friday and a new extension was given to be announced tomorrow morning.
In this context, where the general verdict of the court is pending, by the ruling party, an attempt has been launched for days to defame the struggles against the memorandum in the 2010-2015 period.
The theory of two extremes and squares
In this direction, the Maximos Palace has orchestrated a frontal attack on the logic of the “two ends” and uses SYRIZA as a vehicle to speak of the “impious confluence” of the left with the Golden Dawn.
It is characteristic that supporters of the line of government “argue” using the “upper” and “lower” figures in the context statements by Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis and his government spokesman Stelios Petsas in the days before on the murky waters of the anti-memorandum and the squares of hatred and populism.
Indeed, KINAL is drafted along these lines, defending the government memorandum actions of PASOK and George Papandreou in 2010-2011. “SYRIZA is the daughter of a period of irrationality and the division has grown with food,” said KINAL spokesman Pavlos Christidis.
This crown of the confluence was the angry reaction ND and KINAL for the cover of Avgi where Kyriakos Mitsotakis and Antonis Samaras were attacked with the slogan “they are not innocent”, through which the society had expressed in the previous days its demand for the conviction of Chrysi Avgi and the Chrysaugites.
Dangerous associations
For its part, SYRIZA apologized for the changes in the penal code and that it reduced the penalties for the crime of running a criminal organization.
It even led to a new cycle of introversion with removal of Stavros Kontonis after the latter’s complaints on the negative effects of changes in the penal code on the criminal treatment of gold seekers.
In this context o SYRIZA he wanted to go on the counterattack in exchange for the fire he received from the SW. So after the video you posted with your highlight Alexis Tsipras that the ND cannot claim to be the honoree of the fight against fascism, he concluded cover of sunday today where he talks about ND’s coexistence with Chrysi Avgi.
On the eve of the announcement of the sentences for the goldsmiths convicted by a criminal organization, the political scene is formed with accusations from both sides of coexistence with the Golden Dawn.
In fact, SYRIZA in the selective reporting of government officials voting in parliament to support the narrative of the SYRIZA and Golden Dawn parliamentary alliance fell into a serious stalemate, strengthening and making more dangerous the narrative about two extremes that its executives are recovering. SYRIZA, trying to answer this accusation, creates associations for the union of the KKE and Chrysi Avgi! 
He collaborated to expel Samaras
Especially on this issue are typical what the government spokesman Stelios Petsas said.
“For 4.5 years they did not see (the citizens) that the trial progressed at the pace it should, under various pretexts, while throughout the period the SYRIZA-ANEL government used their votes in various ways Golden Dawn in Parliament on key issues such as the overthrow of the previous Samaras government.
The citizen understands that at key points in the recent history of the country, SYRIZA as a government collaborated with the Golden Dawn on many occasions. Unfortunately. When he was in the opposition, he sided with Chrysi Avgi and Mr. Kouvelis to overthrow the Samaras government, while as a government he used ATHEX votes and said there are no welcome or unwelcome votes in the case of the electoral law.
In many cases, it implemented the participation of ATHEX in communication programs, such as in Kastelorizo, and in many cases, even until recently, we saw that it was doing everything possible to reduce penalties, not be deprived of civil rights and all these issues with In order to get ATHEX until the 2019 elections, perhaps it can cut ND’s autonomy. “Fortunately, the citizens listened to Kyriakos Mitsotakis in the main political bet that he proposed to leave ATHEX out of Parliament and they did,” Petsas said.
Late anti-fascism and identification of the KKE and Golden Dawn
What SYRIZA opposes to this reprimand that ND attributes to him is essentially summarized in an article by Avgi that lists the table with the statistics of votes in parliament and what article about “late SW anti-fascism»He concludes the following:
According to a survey conducted by VouliWatch in collaboration with “Lifo” in the parliamentary period 2015-2019, the percentage of identification of Golden Dawn with ND in the polls was 35.8%. At the same time, the corresponding percentage of ATHEX relative to SYRIZA was only 4.2%, as can be seen in the corresponding table. For the rest of the parties, the percentages are as follows: 25.77% with KIN.ALL., 21.66% with Unión de Centros, 20.32% with Potami and 5.8% with AN.ELL.
Regarding the high percentage of identification with the KKE (72.58%), this is mainly due to the choice of the “present” or the withdrawal of the votes that mainly referred to the approval of the memoranda of commitment. So obviously this is not a political or ideological coincidence. The conclusion is yours. ” 
Extremely voting against the memoranda
The latter implies the anger of Perissos who wonders what is the appropriateness of this move by SYRIZA “to create impressions against the KKE, which in fact never adopted the claim of ND that shields SYRIZA that it identified with the Golden Dawn”. because they voted the same in crucial votes in Parliament. “
The interesting thing is that this position of SYRIZA attributes the “high percentage of identification” of the KKE with Chrysi Avgi in the vote against the memorandum measures! This perception could be considered simply stupid by Koumoundourou, but actually in this way SYRIZA reinforces the slanders of its opponents who oppose the policies of the memorandum as the matrix of fascism.
In addition, in this way, SYRIZA becomes a left-wing alibi of the dangerous two-extreme theory, since in ND’s attempt to present SYRIZA as a communicating vessel with the Golden Dawn, SYRIZA seems to extend ND’s position. and place it in the mill. This about the extremes of the KKE in the logic of equating communism with fascism!
Out of control
In any case, the situation seems to spiral out of control and through this objective cleansing of the Golden Dawn and fascism, ultimately what remains is the slander against the anti-memorandum struggles of the Greek people.
In fact, this rot that arises through this confrontation between SYRIZA and ND shows the real limits of the memo arc at the end.
The “serious golden dawn”
It is worth noting that ND promoted the view that there could be a “serious Golden Dawn” and become a government partner of the Conservative faction, a position that was openly expressed by current ND MP Babis Papadimitriou shortly before the assassination of Fyssa in 2013.
This position essentially had practical application in ND’s clandestine and behind-the-scenes transactions with Chrysi Avgi, as the video from Baltakou Kasidiaris demonstrated.
Coexistence …
It is also worth remembering that in 2016 a variant of Papadimitriou’s position was supported by former SYRIZA Justice Minister Nikos Paraskevopoulos.
“Many of us did not like the image of coexistence in Kastelorizo and Ro. On the other hand, we have to decide which we prefer: an attempt to integrate the Golden Dawn into a climate of democracy or a permanent break. In my opinion, the essence of a convergence must precede “, stated Mr. Paraskevopoulos (interview in Vradyni) and underlined:
Golden Dawn must accept in practice its affiliation to the institutions of the Republic. And this attitude, if it manifests itself, must be supported by the democratic parties. “
Memo twists
This is a SYRIZA position that comes after the asshole of 2015 and the signing of the third memorandum. After all, the ND, which today curses the squares of the indignant to support the narrative of the so-called confluence of the left and the Golden Dawn, forgets that Antonis Samaras had endeavored to embrace the movement of the squares and joined the two-way narrative for the “squares” following ND’s spin memorandum in late 2012 when he contributed to the formation of the tripartite government of Loukas Papadimos.
[ad_2]
