[ad_1]
Shortly before 12 o’clock on Wednesday night, the hearing process for the lawyers was completed for the mitigations invoked by the guilty of the Golden Dawn criminal organization.
The court adjourned the session by 12:30 noon on Thursday for the prosecutor’s speech on extenuating circumstances.
According to estimates, announcements about the convictions ‘sentences and the gold diggers’ prison term are expected on Thursday.
The process will start on Thursday with the prosecutor’s speech and the examination of the applications will continue and, according to estimates, the announcement of the sentences and who will go to prison of those convicted of participation and management of a criminal group.
Police have already been put on alert for arrests.
Scenarios for prayers
Nikos Michaloliakos, Elias Kasidiaris, Giannis Lagos, George Germenis, Elias Panagiotaros, Nikos Papas and Artemis Mattheopoulos were found guilty of running a criminal organization.
The “key” to the fate of the convicted members of Golden Dawn is recognition or non-mitigation by the court. Under the penal code, Nikos Michaloliakos and the other six former members of the neo-Nazi group who were found guilty of leading and joining a criminal organization face sentences of between 5 and 15 years.
At the same time, an important parameter for those found guilty is whether the penalties that will be imposed will be enforceable or suspensive.
The leading group of Chrysi Avgi, if the court immediately imposes executions, will be transferred to a special ward in the Korydallos prison.
The information indicates that work is already underway so that the infrastructure exists so that the seven of the leading team can move there.
The Attorney Hearing Process for Attorneys
Former Golden Dawn MPs and Executives Laying Down Their Latest Legal Weapons to Keep You Out of Jail in the Courtroom of the Three-Member Court of Appeals for Criminal Matters they were found guilty -in his case- to lead and join the criminal organization that wore the parliamentary mantle. Although they are not in the courtroom themselves, a tactic followed by the vast majority at the five-and-a-half-year hearing, their attorneys are asking for help for their clients. The verdicts on the sentences and who will be jailed are expected to be announced on Thursday (8/10).
Then announcement of historic court decision Regarding guilt, those found guilty began to seek recognition of mitigating circumstances, even claiming that they had nothing to do with Golden Dawn, except that … their deputies had been elected. Another, in fact, claimed that he was doing charity work and was a volunteer firefighter to receive more favorable treatment. The speeches of the defenders continue to this day and those who have already developed their arguments have invoked almost all the mitigating factors provided by the Penal Code.
In particular, for the Mich. Arvanite who had been chosen with the Golden Dawn in Acaya, his lawyer requested the attenuation of the legal life. As he said, Mich. Arvanitis is a lawyer, respectable and had he not been elected Golden Dawn MP in 2012 he would not have been among the defendants. He was asked for the same relief Panagiotis Iliopoulos. “He was also chosen Member of Parliament for Magnesia for that and they found him accused “said his attorney. Iliopoulos’s lawyers also demanded that their client be granted mitigation. good behavior.
Your defense Georgiou Germeni – called Kaiada – asked that three total mitigating factors be recognized with the first of legal life. “It did not appear out of nowhere that the specific defendant had committed any criminal act or had committed criminal behavior.”his attorney told the court. Relief was also requested for subsequent good conduct and for an unreasonable length of trial.
Former deputy Antonis Gregos requested the attenuation of legal life and good behavior after the act. According to his defense, there were volunteer firefighter while even before the prosecution proceeded to donations from associations.
by Eleni Zaroulia The attenuation of the previous legal life was requested. “She is the mother of a child, she never gave a reason, she has a white criminal record, all her activities are legal,” said his lawyer, among other things. “She never asked for anything in return. Ms. Zaroulia was here only for one of her speeches in Parliament.” He highlighted the defense of his wife Nick. Michaloliakou. Relief from his subsequent good behavior was also requested.
THE Polyvios Zisimopoulos requested recognition of the mitigating circumstances of the legal life and the unreasonable duration of the trial.
His side Ilia Kasidiari found guilty as director of a criminal organization, requested the attenuation of legal life, good behavior after the fact and the unreasonable duration of the trial. “Mr. Kasidiaris is one misunderstood person, negatively projected. “There was an oss hunter against him, a witch hunt.” His lawyer argued that the acquittals in other cases with the defendants prove it.
The defense of the MEP and convicted of running a criminal organization, Ioannis Lagou, requested the attenuation of the legal life, the good behavior after the fact and the unreasonable duration of the trial. His lawyer referred to the actions of I. Lagos, claiming that “until today promotes the interests of Greece, legally by political means through the European Parliament»
Michaloliakos asks for three attentions
The defense of Nikos Michaloliakos demanded the recognition of the attenuation of his legal life. “His legal life is a fact.” If Michaloliakos does not have it, who has it? “Said his lawyer.” He has a path that nobody can give him anything. “Nobody provoked himself as much as Michaloliakos and did not react,” he added. lawyer.
Michaloliakou’s side also asked to tone down the recognition. for subsequent good conduct and for an unreasonable length of trial.
“A leader of a political party who was elected with a specific political position and job suddenly finds himself accused and I try to guess what he was leading … we showed that he did not know them. I’m trying to understand how he led and what he led … “, noted N. Michaloliakos’s lawyer and continued:” If it is to make an ideological tribunal and I did not take it lightly, then it is my fault. “But since I know where I am, you can’t tell me that he has a criminal organization, because he was the general secretary of a legitimate political party.”
Regarding legal life, the defense of Michaloliakos stated that his client has no convictions. “He has produced a job and has not stopped liking it. He created a political body. Help people. He provided parliamentary work, “it was reported. Regarding the subsequent good behavior, the defense said:” Without him knowing it, a crime was committed, he was insulted and placed in preventive detention. “He did everything and had a trip without anyone telling him attribute nothing. “
Michaloliakou’s lawyer also stated: “It is not social behavior to treat a defendant in this way. It makes no sense, on the eve of the decision, to publish statements that were not directed at Michaloliakos but elsewhere. They were not intended for the defendants. . Mr. Michaloliakos didn’t do the slightest thing, didn’t give a writing sample. Why were they done? Why did they tell the losers of 45 about these jokes? “
Nikos Michos asked that four reliefs be recognized, including relief from practical regret. Nick’s attorney. Michou told the court: “Since 2013 he has been in complete disagreement with Chrysi Avgi. He did not falsify reality with masculinity in relation to what was happening. He condemned political violence. He demanded a tribute to the late Pavlos Fyssas, the deceased has the right, and I read an excerpt from Mr. Kampagiannis’s book by order of my client. ” In fact, the defense attorney stated, among other things, that Nick. Michos loved animals and had married the same woman twice.
Barbarossa’s side He requested the attenuation of the legal life, the subsequent good behavior, the unreasonable duration of the trial but also the non-humble motives. “There is an incompatibility between the decision and the prosecutor’s proposal, which creates the expectation that in the appeal trial that the party will have been dissolved, it will take place in other circumstances,” Barbarousis said in court. He also stated that it is not possible for lawyers to place themselves in mitigating circumstances when they do not know the reasoning behind the court decision. “Barbarousis is being sanctioned because at some point he became politicized since we do not have the rest of the reasons for the decision. He did not participate in any decision making. What did the criminal organization expect? “I have no reason …” said his defense.
THE Η.Παναγιωτάρος asked for 3 painkillers. He insisted on his previous honest life, arguing that the court was obliged to recognize him.
Christos Pappas also asked for relief. Her lawyer told her: “Justice has been blatantly affected. Unfair influence against her. Attempts were made to intimidate her.” Among others, the defense of Chr. Pappas asked to be recognized as a lawful life and then a good behavior. The court’s decision on mitigation is expected tomorrow.
The judicial decision
It is recalled that according to the judicial sentence guilty of address of a criminal organization seven former Golden Dawn deputies were convicted.
These are them Nikos Michaloliakos, Christos Papas, Ilias Kasidiaris, Ioannis Lagos, George Germeni, Elias Panagiotaros and Artemi Mattheopoulos.
Still guilty of Join and participate in the Golden Dawn criminal organization judged former members:
Panagiotis Iliopoulos,
Polyvios Zisimopoulos,
Antonis Gregos,
Nikolaos Michos,
Nikolaos Kouzilos,
Konstantinos Barmarousis,
Efstathios Boukouras,
Chrysovalantis Alexopoulos,
Michalis Arvanitis,
Eleni Zaroulia and
Dimitrios Koukoutsis.
They were also tried as members of the same criminal organization. Nice Nuclear Chiefs George Patelis Y Perama Anastasios Pantazis.
News Today:
How did the political world react to the historic Golden Dawn decision?
Freshman Enrollment: How Students Will Receive Codes – Instructions for Non-Electronic Writers
Varoufaki’s complaint to a police officer that he found him outside the Court of Appeal
