[ad_1]
It seems. From the first ten minutes of the second half. It seems. Miles away. The Panathinaikos played with fire, they never went out on the field again, as they did in Tripoli and “shouted” the thing that was going for “crime and punishment.”
The “clover” returned from the dressing room to manage the 1-0, play with time, give space to the AEL and try to preserve the score in favor. You are Panathinaikos and these games, You have to go in to look for the second goal, you have to step on the grass to play initiative football, to create and not wait for time to pass and defend in 2/3 of the field as if it were in front of you, there is Klopp’s army or Flick.
Unjustifiably, without substance, especially when the opponent is not a team that has the quality, the creation, the productivity that will close you in your area. This is an organized set of Grigoriou, a fighting team, but it is not the band that will come in and impose themselves on you to wait for him the whole half time behind the crossbar.
What happened in 87 ‘with the Pinakas tie was the result of an image of a whole half. It was logical. New gel, problematic new image and progress are ignored, as well as the first victory in the championship …
PHOBIC POGIATOS LEFT HIM HELPLESS
Danny Pogiatos’s phobia cost Panathinaikos the win tonight, and the 42-year-old did an incredibly bad workout in the second half.
1) You decide to backtrack your team for the entire half, to give AEL room and hope for a draw. The Catalan feels great pressure to put Panathinaikos on the road to victory and in his attempt to make the second κάνει tonight in Alcázar, he paid dearly in the final! It is a question of whether the young and inexperienced coach can handle the pressure and certainly the management of the second part, as a mindset, is problematic.
two) He saw that his team could not hold the ball in midfield to go to the spaces that existed, he saw that his team stayed strong on the axis and didn’t “cool down” when you needed your gear hub. The first changes were Pougouras instead of Juankar and Savier instead of Makenda in 74 ‘! He let Ayub walk in the last half hour, with the Moroccan doing good deeds (the “1-2” with Makenda at the beginning of the goal phase, an opening in Juankar) but also many “sales” of the ball, continuing to play a slower speed, releases no energy, and completes the game on grass rather than on the bench.
3) He decides to remove Makeda and not Carlitos who was very bad throughout the game, did not do a good deed. The Italian scored the goal, in the second half when he played on the left “band” he had a good tactical behavior and as time goes by this “alchemy” with the Italian playing the first half in the first half and the Spanish in the second. as if … he divides time so there are no complaints, he does worse things on the lawn than better.
Pogiatos must decide. Immediately. Either he will play a system with 2 fors, or the best, the most capable will play on top. In the first half of tonight he lost to (already bad) Carlitos, in the second Makeda …
NO IMPROVEMENT IN THE PRODUCTION PHASE
Panathinaikos managed to score tonight. After a very good team collaboration. Vertical Bouzouki, Aitor’s perfect shot, where it should be, as it should be when the winger is on the goal line (diagonally at the penalty mark), a good move by Makenda and a shot from the right. Good sign. Yes. It’s enough? Obviously not.
What else did Panathinaikos do during the match? Long shot from Veleth, misplaced header by Makenda and shot by Aitor in the final, with a good presence from the Spanish winger, with an assist and a perfect cross for the Italian’s head.
The “clover” continues to present the image of a team that does not know what to do with the ball to break the rival defense, the image of a team that “blocks” with ease, lacking the player or players who will have an easy pass. In the area, Panathinaikos lack the quick alternations of the ball in the attack third and the rhythm.
SANCHES “BLACK HOLE”
Suspiciously, Panathinaikos did not accept phases in the defensive transition, he was clearly more “orderly” when he lost the ball, but:
1) Give at least half a dozen silly fouls outside the box, giving AEL the opportunity to “fill in” the area.
2) On a tragic night, he had Sánchez on the far right of the defense. Apart from the fact that it did not help creativity at all, does the Argentine assist στον Milosavljevts turning the ball in goal without being seen and “saved” by Dioudis in the goal phase of AEL?
It starts in the phase and is next to the Table, having closed where it should. But then he gets carried away by the phase It goes wrong for Torce and allows the young center forward to score a goal like in training.
PS1: I insist and will insist that the coach of each team, especially a completely new team, must be judged at the end of the season. and have a critique of what his team presents in each of its matches and what it does during the match, in training. Unless, of course, there is some progress.
But as time passes and Panathinaikos remains uncorrected, if not, they also fail to beat Aris, I predict that the majority shareholder will pick up his “weapon” and nothing will remain standing, once again. Wrong again and again.
Let’s hope that the logic of football prevails in PAE. The roster is good for the data, most of the players who have come can give something more than last year and the manager wants his time. Pogiatos simply has to start showing work. Not even a “sew-pull”, or another “back and forth”, will be catastrophic …
Individual assessment: Dioudis 6, Juankar 6, Sanchez 3, Senkefeld 5, Veleth 5, Kourbelis 5, Ayub 4, Bouzoukis 6, Aitor 6, Carlitos 3, Makenda 6, Savier 3, Pougouras 3. Serpezis, Hatzigiovanis, Ioan cannot, since they played little.
[ad_2]
