[ad_1]
print edition
ΕΦ.ΣΥΝ.
Even when the prosecutor gave them a chance to ask themselves questions, the two defendants in the horrible Eleni Topaloudi case said, “Why did they do that?” insisting on the charges ● “You speak the same language; the language of the rapists,” the prosecutor told them unarmed.
In a one-minute scene, the entire evidentiary process of the trial for the rape and murder of the student Eleni Topaloudi, in November 2018 in Rhodes, was concentrated. The prosecutor called the accused to exercise their right to question themselves and they chose the exact same question: “Why did they do that?” Until the last minute, they insisted on blaming each other, but the prosecutor has not been convinced by his allegations and his current sentence on the sentences is expected to be a catapult.
“How you feel;” was the first question the prosecutor asked yesterday to the accused A.L. And when he replied, “I feel like it was time to tell the truth,” he asked, “So you want to change something of what you have said so far in your apology?” Because you say you will tell the truth … “.
The defendant did not change anything, but almost everything has changed, from his first apology to the port authorities, when he said he hit Eleni because she refused to consent to a sexual act. A few days later, he asked the Rhodes investigator, in the presence of his lawyer, and used the first plural to describe what followed. However, in his apology, he stated that he was confused at the time and when he was isolated in prison, he thought better of it.
With repeated questions every minute from the moment they met the student to the moment they tried to eradicate any guilt, the prosecutor shed light on every aspect of the case and announced his conviction for rape and murder.
“You have never stepped on Eleni’s house, you can’t even describe it, everything is a lie,” he told AL yesterday. who claimed to have met with Eleni two days before the murder and slept in her home. And when he admitted that he and his co-defendants were attracting girls to “share them,” the prosecutor said, “This was modus operandi.” You found that the girls and the other put the money, “she said, adding that after setting the student up, they went to court to present her as” perverted, sex-obsessed, alcoholic and paranoid. “
Fiscal: He tells us that Eleni sent him a message if he is “preparing a threesome” and that you and your co-defendant went to his house. Then;
ALABAMA: When he was down, I texted him, “We are here.”
Fiscal: Did he answer you?
ALABAMA: Yes, he asked me, “Who did you bring?”
Fiscal: Didn’t he know you were going two?
ALABAMA: I went upstairs to explain.
But at a time when A.L. When the bell rang, the student was on the phone with her friend Ariadne Leivaditi, who testified that Eleni was surprised by the knock on the door the last hour and calculated that it was A.L. who they had met and talked to with messages. He also said that they could go out to eat because he was hungry.
Fiscal: There is a video showing that M.K. It was hidden in the carriage. And where you are waiting, you are very nervous, very anxious. Why; After supposedly inviting him to a group meeting.
ALABAMA: I don’t remember, can we take a break?
Fiscal: No, this is not Hilton, it is a court and I have specific questions. Why didn’t the three of them get in the car and M.K. entered the car covered with wood?
ALABAMA: We don’t fit
Fiscal: Well, it looks good on you. And it was both night and winter and you were over an hour to go to M.K.
Very characteristic was the moment when the accused tried to present that from the first moment he met Eleni, she asked him for a group meeting and addressed another friend. “I called him and asked if he could go home with a girl. Of course he understood what I meant, what would two boys do with a girl? A.L. stated, to get the prosecutor’s response:” You speak the same language; the rapists’ language. “
Respectively crucial were the questions from the president and regular judges, who forced the defendant to admit that he was in bed next to Eleni, when he claimed that only her friend started hitting her on the wall and tried to stab and strangle her
A.L. He has been found at the base of the iron with which they hit Eleni on the head, causing her to bleed, while, although she denies that two knives were used to exempt herself from responsibility, the authorities found two knives at the point where she indicated that she dropped the incriminating evidence.
What was not found was the bedding that was soaked in the student’s blood. “I asked him what we were going to do with the mattress. He said he would fix it,” he testified, apologizing to AL, while his co-defendant said “my mother would throw it away.”
The prosecutor characterized M.K.’s father and grandmother. as false witnesses, as well as the sister of A.L. and you will be asked to send the proceedings of the trial to a prosecutor to verify your role in the case.