The rich damage the climate much more than the poor



[ad_1]

According to one study, the richest percentage of the world’s population expels more than twice as many climate-damaging carbon dioxide emissions into the atmosphere than the poorest half of humanity. This emerges from a report the development organization Oxfam published before the general debate at the 75th UN General Assembly in New York that began on Tuesday. Oxfam called on the rich to reduce their CO2 consumption, invest more in public infrastructure, and rebuild the economy in a climate-friendly way.

The report focuses on the climate significant years 1990 to 2015, in which emissions doubled worldwide:

  • The richest ten percent (630 million) were more than half (52 percent) of CO2 emissions.

  • I have the richest percentage (63 million) alone 15 percent accomplished,

  • while the poorest half of the world’s population only by seven percent he was responsible.

The catastrophic consequences of the climate crisis are already being felt in many places. “This is due to a policy that focuses on consumer incentives, promises steady growth and economically divides the world into winners and losers,” said Ellen Ehmke, an expert on social inequality at Oxfam Germany. “The poorest pay the price for the consumer frenzy of a rich minority.”

The biggest drivers of emissions in Germany too: air traffic and SUVs

In Germany, according to Oxfam, the richest ten percent or 8.3 million people are responsible for 26 percent of German CO2 emissions in the period under review. At 41.5 million people, the poorest half of the German population, five times as large, only consumed slightly more at 29 percent. One lever in the fight against climate change is traffic, especially air traffic. Oxfam is particularly critical of urban SUVs, which were the second largest generator of emissions between 2010 and 2018.

“We have to solve the climate crisis and the inequality crisis together,” Ehmke said. Excessive CO2 consumption by the wealthiest is at everyone’s expense and must be restricted. “Taxes on SUVs that damage the weather and frequent flights would be a first step.”

Icon: The mirror

[ad_2]