Prime ministers disagree: dispute over accommodation breaks out openly



[ad_1]

While criticism of the accommodation ban is mounting, the Prime Minister of Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, Schwesig, continues to see the move as correct. But several of his colleagues see it very differently.

Before the prime minister’s first in-person conference with Chancellor Angela Merkel for months, it became clear how difficult it was to reach an agreement on the issue of the accommodation ban. Country managers have completely different opinions on the controversial issue. Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania Prime Minister Manuela Schwesig, for example, is against a relaxation of the accommodation ban for tourists from risk areas in Corona. “I am not in favor of that: potatoes, potatoes,” said the SPD politician of the ARD. Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania will not participate in a softening at the Prime Minister’s Conference on Wednesday with Chancellor Angela Merkel.

Schwesig also said: “We need a clear and strict line. At a time when the numbers are increasing in Germany, it cannot be decreasing.” Instead, the 46-year-old spoke out in favor of stricter rules, “especially in risk areas,” explaining: “We did well with our strict rules early on in the Corona period. We have the lowest infection rates. Although we have three times as many tourists. How are we really people in the country. That shows that our rules work well. ”

The ban “doesn’t make sense”

The state of Brandenburg does not want to loosen its restrictions regarding the accommodation ban, but North Rhine-Westphalia will not continue to implement the controversial ban. NRW Health Minister Karl-Josef Laumann from the CDU announced in Düsseldorf. To his knowledge, such bans “do not make sense because they do not help to stop the chain of infection.” And he emphasized: “We have to be careful to maintain acceptance of what we do.” Many crown measurements have been accepted in recent months. “But this move ruined a lot of acceptance,” he said, referring to the accommodation ban. Rhineland-Palatinate Prime Minister Malu Dreyer had already said on Monday that she did not want to implement the ban.

The mayor of Berlin, Michael Müller, also reiterated his criticism. “The accommodation ban is pointless and only creates confusion and misunderstanding,” he told ThePioneer news portal. He noted that many Berliners travel every day to the neighboring state of Brandenburg, “but they have to be home for the night.”

Meanwhile, Bavarian Prime Minister Markus Söder has urgently warned against a further worsening of the infection situation. “If we don’t act quickly and consistently, the worst threat,” he said of Bayerischer Rundfunk. If the number of infections increases across the board, there must be stricter measures everywhere. He defended the accommodation ban, but did not insist on it. Regulation is a subordinate issue, says the CSU politician.

Baden-Wuerttemberg Prime Minister Winfried Kretschmann, on the other hand, firmly adheres to the accommodation ban. “I just stopped the suspension of the ban,” he told reporters in Stuttgart. Now it is about slowing down the infection process and preventing it from spreading. “We only have the virus under control if we are able to trace the chains of infection locally.” Baden-Württemberg Minister of Social Affairs Manfred Lucha stated that hotels were known not to be hotspots when infected. But it’s about reducing the incentive to be mobile.

CSU Secretary General Markus Blume has warned federal state heads of government not to risk what could be the last chance against a second national shutdown at their meeting. “We only have a very narrow window of time in which we can manage to avoid a new blockade with very binding measures,” he told the “Augsburger Allgemeine.” “Whether we can do that will be decided on Wednesday at the Prime Minister’s Conference.”

Requires standardization

The Federal Government Tourism Commissioner, Thomas Bareiß, spoke in favor of standardizing the accommodation rules. “We need the most uniform and above all clear rules that really serve to protect health, otherwise we jeopardize acceptance among the population,” “Rhein-Neckar-Zeitung” told Heidelberg.

The leader of the union parliamentary group Ralph Brinkhaus also believes that the top round should send a “clear signal against the small states”. “We need clarity for people in Germany, this is especially true for travel within Germany,” he said in Hamburg.

The meeting should not only be about the accommodation ban, but also. In most federal states, people in regions with more than 50 new infections per 100,000 inhabitants can only stay in a hotel within a week if they can present a negative corona test that is no more than 48 hours old. Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania also stipulates a 14-day quarantine immediately after entry. Both are often criticized for being disproportionate and the use of testing capabilities is also criticized.

[ad_2]