[ad_1]
Last fall, Claudia H. had to appear for three days in front of the first main criminal chamber of the Hanau Regional Court. She did so with obvious disgust. It was about the death of her son Jan. The boy died on August 17, 1988 at the house of a close friend, she was four years old. He choked on vomit porridge while he slept.
After 32 years, that friend sat on the dock: Sylvia D., 73, elegantly dressed and, according to her own statements, blessed with supernatural abilities. A woman who sees herself as God’s mouthpiece and is said to be in direct contact with him. She was charged with murder.
On Thursday, the First Main Criminal Chamber convicted Sylvia D. of murder and arrested her by two plainclothes officers in the room and took her to a correctional facility.
Claudia H. has now also been arrested. Immediately after the verdict was rendered, the Hanau prosecutor filed a request for an arrest warrant, due to the urgent suspicion of complicity in the murder. The 59-year-old woman, who has a doctorate in biology, was in Leipzig when she was arrested Friday night.
It should really come as no surprise to those who followed the grounds of the verdict at Congress Park Hanau: Presiding Judge Peter Graßmück had held Jan’s parents responsible. It affected the camera, Graßmück said, who had left their daughter Sylvia D. of course the child was neglected and experienced violence. The parents thus contributed to Jan’s death.
“He was always so provocatively petty”
Graßmück cited the diary entries that Claudia H. had made a few hours after Jan’s death. In it she wrote: “He was always so provocatively petty.” Y: Sylvia D. had warned him about “her unstoppable and heartless nature.” According to Graßmück, these searches are a “vile calculation of an adult with a defenseless child”.
According to the Court’s conviction, Jan was exposed to the arbitrariness of Sylvia D: they kicked him, beat him, pulled his hair, beat him with a wooden spoon, gave him a cold shower, and washed his mouth with soap. He had to sleep and starve on a mattress between the toilet and the sink, or they would shove food into him until it came out of his nose.
For Sylvia D. Jan he was – as her notes show – the “reincarnation of Hitler”, a “nasty guy who smiles dirty”, a “show monkey”, a “sadist, to be tortured”.
Jan’s parents, who did not appear as co-plaintiffs in the lawsuit against Sylvia D., viewed him in a similar light. Worse still, they came forward as defense witnesses. And in part they became entangled in contradictions. Claudia H. once said that she felt cornered by questions from the court.
“She has been seeking God all her life and has gained a lot of wisdom and has been able to help many people,” enthused Claudia H. about the alleged murderer of her son. Sylvia D. is not to blame for her son’s death. “I know that Mrs. D. loved all the children.” She admired Sylvia D. for the way she treated her two biological children and seven other children she had cared for or adopted.
He described his own son as a difficult and insensitive person who made a conscious decision for “the dark side.” Sylvia D. is said to have described Jan as “possessed by evil.”
When the investigation was resumed a few years ago, Jan’s body was exhumed. In the boy’s grave, which has now been reoccupied, the coroner found only six bone fragments that came from Jan’s spine. It is not yet clear where the generally well-preserved bones, such as the skull, thigh, and humerus are found. . The cemetery administration did not attempt to dissolve the children’s graves in 2012; It was Jan’s own parents.
