[ad_1]
Andrej Mangold is not well received in the “Summer House of the Stars”. Image: imago / Gartner
“Manipulative, scheming, completely calculating”: Ex-bachelor accounts with “Sommerhaus” -Andrej
The “summer house” can be a great opportunity, but in terms of image it can also be a good grip on the toilet. Above all, single Andrej Mangold, who moved to RTL “Sommerhaus” with his chosen and still girlfriend Jennifer, is currently facing extreme criticism. The reason: In the reality show he has to share a house and yard with his “Bachelor” runner-up Eva Benetatou, and neither he nor his lover leave them good hair. “Disabled”, “Bitch”, “that damn person”, “what the hell” or “she is filth under my feet” are just some of the insults that came from Jennifer’s lips.
And Andrej Mangold wasn’t exactly a bright moment with his looks. He tends to be overly confident and arrogant, especially when it comes to dealing with Eva. Something that does not go down well with the audience. A real shit storm broke out on social media. Andrej commented everything on his Instagram story only in monosyllables: “It’s disgusting what is happening.”
Sebastian Pannek was more than clear. Image: imago / Gartner
Sebastian Pannek harshly criticizes “Sommerhaus” -Andrej
But it’s not just the fans who get mad. Andrej even had to take a beating from his own singles team. Sebastian Pannek, also a former RTL Rosenkavalier, shared on Instagram against Andrej’s appearance in “Sommerhaus”:
With his statement, he not only alludes to what has been shown to viewers on television so far, but also to next Wednesday’s episode. Because this is already available on TVNow. And so Andrej seems to be racing back towards the best inhuman performances.
“Summer House”: Andrej and Jenny did not like Eva. image: tvnow
Ex-Bachelor doesn’t want to be compared to Andrej Mangold
For the Bachelor of 2017 it is also absolutely impossible for Andrej to take a position on Instagram about the “summer house” afterwards, but in no way does he apologize for his behavior. Sebastian Pannek, however, goes a step further in his criticism:
(Yes)
