Have the crown deniers gone into hiding? Attila Hildmann probably wanted for arrest warrant



[ad_1]

There appears to be an arrest warrant from the Berlin prosecutor’s office for Attila Hildmann. Shortly before it was known that investigators were examining more than 1,000 statements by the conspiratorial ideologue.

Attila Hildmann has gone into hiding? Is the vegan chef hiding from the Berlin investigating authorities? This information is currently circulating on social media. Distributed by police reporters such as Axel Lier and the conspiratorial ideologue himself, who speaks of an arrest warrant against him on his Telegram account. These reports also match the information from t-online. In Berlin police circles it is heard that an arrest warrant for the prosecutor is available, but has not yet been carried out. Neither the Berlin prosecutor nor the police want to officially confirm it.

Hildmann lives in Wandlitz in Brandenburg. The 39-year-old man’s house was searched there in November last year. Various storage media, such as hard drives and mobile phones, were protected. The Berlin prosecutor’s office received a court order to evaluate various laptops, cell phones, memory cards and USB sticks.

“These are intensive and time-consuming investigations.”

In the Berlin investigation against the narrator of the conspiracy, more than 1,000 statements are individually verified. These are suspicions of sedition, insults and threats. “These are intensive, extensive and time-consuming investigations,” a spokeswoman for the prosecution said Tuesday. “Evaluation of the evidence continues.” The “Süddeutsche Zeitung” had previously reported that the collection of evidence was progressing slowly. According to this, one of the hard drives is said to be so damaged that the data cannot be read, and with another, the researchers would not be able to pass Hildmann’s password protection.

Hildmann calls himself the “far right”. He had repeatedly appeared in protests against the crown’s protective measures and attracted attention with inflammatory remarks. According to previous information from the prosecution, it must be clarified whether Hildmann could have exceeded the limits of freedom of expression and to what extent he could have been prosecuted.

[ad_2]