[ad_1]
Updated:
-
ofSebastian Horsch
conclude
-
Mike schier
conclude
Travelers returning from the risk areas of Corona cause arguments. The quarantine is intended to replace the mandatory crown test. Those affected do not have to take vacations.
- The mandatory test for travelers Crown-Risikogebieten should be spread over quarantine be replaced.
- the Ministry of Health now it points to a special point in article 56 of the Infection Protection Law, which regulates the assumption of costs in such cases.
- Basic Facts about the coronavirus* and Corona news from Germany can be found here. We also provide you with current case numbers on a map. Germany.
Munich: travelers returning from a corona risk zone and in quarantine have to, shouldn’t take a vacation for it and also no loss of profit I have to fear. According to the Federal Ministry of Health, the state intervenes in these cases. It is regulated in Section 56 of the Infection Protection Act. A ministry spokesperson told our newspaper upon request that it was “the agreed legal opinion of the federal government” that this also applies if one “knowingly drives in a risk area.”
Corona quarantine by the state? Söder reacts to skeptics
Regulation is complicated because Minister Jens Spahn (CDU) is planning, which was promoted mainly by Bavaria Mandatory test for returnees to be abolished again and replaced by a more extensive quarantine. Prime Minister Markus Söder * (CSU), therefore, reacted negatively to a cost assumption. “We are fundamentally skeptical,” said the CSU editor of our newspaper. “This creates disproportionately higher costs to the taxpayerwithout improving security. ”
Claims for compensation for lost profits for employees and self-employed
A Compensation for lost profits after Section 56 (1) IfSG GrantedIf a person is subject to a ban on activity or isolation as a person who excretes, is suspected of being contagious, suspected of being infected, or another carrier of pathogens, Section 56 (1) of the Infection Protection Act (IfSG ).
Compensation is dependent on loss of income: for the first six weeks, it is awarded for the full amount of loss of income. At the beginning of the seventh week, it is awarded for the amount of sick pay in accordance with Article 47, Paragraph 1 of Book V of the Social Security Code (SGB V), provided that the loss of income does not exceed the limit of annual income from legal health insurance companies.
(Source: Federal Ministry of Health: Questions and Answers on Compensation Claims in accordance with Section 56 of the Infection Protection Act (IfSG))
Bavaria wants to stick to the corona tests
Dealing with travelers will be one of the main points of contention at the Prime Minister’s meeting with Angela Merkel. Spahn has many federal health ministers behind him. They say mass testing is too expensive and takes up too much laboratory capacity. Bavaria really wants to stick with it.
Söder is supported by the director of the Munich airport, Jost Lammers. A mandatory quarantine will set the travel industry back. “This would mean that a large number of private and business travelers would no longer be able to implement their travel plans,” Lammers said. * Merkur.de is part of the German Ippen digital publishing network
A travel advisory has been in effect for much of the world since March, a one-time process. And so it is for the moment. An internal document emerged before Merkel’s Crown summit.
