[ad_1]
Position of the document against the closure: now the supposed supporters distance themselves
| Reading time: 3 minutes
A room is cleaned and disinfected in an intensive care unit
Source: dpa / Fabian Strauch
In a controversial statement, the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians and virologists Streeck and Schmidt-Chanasit opposed a new shutdown. The alleged signatories of the document move away from them.
METERSeveral medical associations have clearly distanced themselves from the position paper of the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians (KBV). The associations had previously been named as supporters in the document released Wednesday.
In the document, the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians spoke out against a widespread shutdown of everyday life to contain the crown. “A general lockdown regulation is neither desirable nor enforceable,” KBV chief Andreas Gassen said. No new lockdown, no bans: That was the doctors’ request, published shortly before the federal and state governments agreed to broad contact restrictions and other measures on Wednesday.
KBV developed the article together with virologists Hendrik Streeck and Jonas Schmidt-Chanasit. In addition, numerous associations were included as sponsors, including the umbrella association of specialists in Germany, to which 29 associations belong.
However, one of the associations represented by the umbrella association, the Professional Association of German Anesthetists (BDA), criticized the position paper. There is currently no alternative to significantly restricting contacts, BDA President Götz Geldner is quoted in a press release Thursday.
The Corona role was not discussed
Much more so than in the spring, it is now about avoiding a collapse of all intensive care medicine and thus a large number of deaths: “We cannot stand idly by in the face of the avalanche, which could soon be resolved, as a society and health system, “Geldner said. His association, which has more than 20,000 members on its own account, knew nothing of the article prior to publication and does not endorse its content. This is also the opinion of the sister society German Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (DGAI), which has more than 15,000 members.
In addition to anesthetists, the Professional Association of German Rheumatologists (BDRh) also distanced itself. “We would like to make it explicitly clear that we do not support this position paper nor have we consented to an action by our association,” said a press release Thursday.
In letters to the main association and the KBV, the rheumatologists demand that the name of their association be removed from the list of supporters. “Such sleight of hand to feign broad support in the medical profession is not acceptable. In the interest of our patients, we support the measures decided by the federal government. “
Professional association sees “need for clarification”
The Professional Association of German Internists (BDI) also reacted with astonishment to the article. There is a need for clarification with KBV, the partnership announced on Twitter. “Also, the form and timing were not right. The advice was not possible. “
In a version of the position paper that was updated on Friday, the BDA, BDRh and BDI are no longer listed by name as supporters, unlike an earlier version, but the leading specialist association in Germany is still listed as representatives of 29 member associations. .
The list of supporters also includes the Federal Chamber of Psychotherapists (BPtK). However, in a statement, the medical association welcomed the contact restrictions decided on Wednesday by the federal and state governments, but also called for special protection concepts for the elderly.
Furthermore, the position paper apparently does not have the support of all the KVB representatives. Johannes Fechner, vice president of the KVB in Baden-Württemberg, distanced himself from her in the SWR. The document was created when the numbers of corona cases were even lower. In Baden-Württemberg, it supports the decisions of the state government.
Intensive care physicians are also behind the actions taken by the federal government. The resolutions of the federal and state governments are very sensible, Clemens Wendtner, chief doctor for infectious diseases at the Schwabing Clinic in Munich, said in Berlin on Thursday. Uwe Janssens, president of the German Interdisciplinary Association for Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine (DIVI), said clinics should already ask themselves which patients could postpone agreed operations with a clear conscience. Therefore, the motto can only be: “Drive down!”
[ad_2]
