Boris Johnson and the alert in Congress



[ad_1]

reThe outrage in our own ranks has not yet reached the danger zone, but it is audible: Some two dozen Conservative MPs apparently want to vote no when the Internal Market Law and unilateral changes to the exit agreement with the EU are submitted to vote in the lower house.

The Johnson administration has such a large majority that it can outnumber dissenters. It also won’t matter much to him that Johnson’s three predecessors as prime minister criticize the violation of international law as devastating. But even on a day when the signing of a trade deal with Japan is announced, it is fair to wonder whether countries can still be sure that London will honor contractual obligations.

Johnson should not take alarmed voices lightly in the US Congress. If the changes jeopardize the Good Friday Agreement in any way, then you can ignore a bilateral trade agreement, regardless of whether a Brexit fan is in the White House or not.

Many members of Congress are indifferent to what is happening on the island of Ireland. They see the reestablishment of a “hard border” as an affront. His opposition would be the price Johnson would have to pay for his announced breach of contract. In any case, this week has cast great doubts about his ability to be a partner.

[ad_2]