[ad_1]
meIt is not a forward-looking look that guests are discussing at Anne Will. Actually, the broadcast should be the prelude to the current ARD theme week. Its title: “How do we want to live?” In a small group, however, they quickly talk about current Corona politics, debt brakes, and gender language.
SPD chancellor candidate and federal finance minister Olaf Scholz has already had a campaign-ready exchange of blows with Friedrich Merz on the benefits of part-time work. As is well known, the CDU politician would like to discuss the Chancellery with Scholz in the Bundestag elections next year.
However, these plans are not yet known to Greens co-chair Annalena Baerbock. On the show, the Bundestag member fights for gender-appropriate language and stylizes the dispute as “a system issue.”
The most enduring accusation
Baerbock does not consider current financial aid from the federal government to be sustainable enough. “Currently, 21 billion are allocated to the fossil sector,” he criticizes. State aid for Lufthansa, around seven billion euros from the German side, must be subject to conditions.
This has also happened with Lufthansa’s subsidiary airlines. In Austria, for example, minimum ticket prices have been agreed. The co2-Emissions must be reduced. For Baerbock it is important to look to future generations, “because it is precisely these young people who only have their graduation party once they are given an incredible amount to protect everyone.”
The tax proposal
Merz fears future generations will be overwhelmed by Baerbock’s plans. The CDU man also rejects his proposal to ease the investment debt brake. The money spent would have to “pay those who are supposed to benefit today with their taxes tomorrow.”
The debt brake was put in place for bad times, “in order to discipline the federal government to some extent to use money sparingly.” The applicant for the presidency of the CDU complains about the low investment of individuals. Young companies would prefer to go abroad because conditions are better there, for example, with lower taxes and lower administrative costs.
Therefore, Merz would like to ease the startups. They do not have to pay any taxes during the first ten years to establish their business in Germany: “From an economic point of view, that has multiple benefits compared to possible tax losses.”
Exchange of blows for part-time work
Be careful not to get used to living without work, Merz said in September. Will pulls out the sentence: Merz feels misunderstood. He said this in the context of a company where the cut-time subsidy and part-time jobs would have given employees more money than full-time employment.
“When you say a sentence like this, millions of employees feel bad, seriously hurt and offended,” says Scholz. The short-term work allowance is helping to weather the crisis well. Merz is convinced of the money itself, but finds the current regulation incorrect.
Merz believes that the current extension until the end of next year is wrong. It would have been better to review the application every quarter. “That would have been completely wrong,” Scholz responds.
This is important for the safety of the companies concerned. “They can’t live with having to move from one coalition committee to another,” says Scholz, “they need a clear message.”
The gender issue
With his question about gender-sensitive language, Will wants to change the show’s tagline a bit. And Scholz immediately goes into attack mode. Criticism of the Federal Ministry of Justice bill, which was drafted in purely female language, shows that “we govern with someone who does not even understand what is intended.
“Right now we have some other problems that we have to solve,” Merz counters. It heads the world’s largest free trade agreement that China just concluded with 14 other countries.
“And we are discussing ‘believer’ or ‘believer’ here. I think we will have to sort and organize our priorities a bit at this point. “
“We have some huge challenges to overcome at the moment,” adds Merz. “What will happen in Europe in the next ten years? We would have to discuss that. “
Instead, discussing gender at this point and completely ignoring “what’s going on in the world” is “a bold idea.”
Baerbock then elevates the discussion of gender to the “system problem.” You have to know what values you have to defend. It is open to members of the Bundestag if this also includes Brandenburg’s Parity Law, which she cites several times. But you can also do it, after all, it has been declared unconstitutional for a long time.
[ad_2]
