Trump sends his “bulldog” to fight for the US elections



[ad_1]

He boasts of being able to smell crime. Rudy giuliani Trump tasked him with turning the election result in his favor. So far, the American lawyer has caused mostly head shakes.

Series of photos with 17 images

It was Rudy Giuliani’s daughter who referred to her father as Donald Trump’s “personal bulldog.” Caroline Rose Giuliani spoke out before the US elections in early November, warning against a second term for the man her father represents as a personal attorney. Trump is now sitting in the White House as president-elect and has put his fighting dog on election results that he doesn’t like. “I know about crimes, I can smell them,” said the last 76-year-old.

Giuliani as Trump’s henchman, who is not always successful

Giuliani claims to be able to prove that Trump was robbed of Joe Biden as a result of a vote theft organized by the Democratic Party. Giuliani was considered a hero after his time as mayor of New York City, but now many ridicule him as a not always successful henchman of the president. The more unlikely the current effort becomes in light of deadlines and dismissed lawsuits, the more unrestrained Trump’s lawyers roar, increasingly immersed in conspiracy theories.

In a 40-minute monologue at a press conference last Thursday, Giuliani spoke furiously about massive electoral fraud, for which he has yet to present any solid evidence. Attorneys Jenna Ellis and Sidney Powell continued with previously disproved allegations and incoherent theories. In short, his explanation for Trump’s defeat is as follows: Biden’s ballots have been scanned multiple times, so millions of votes are invalid for him. Also involved in the fraud are Cuba, Venezuela (including former President Hugo Chávez, who died in 2013), China, large cities in the United States, Antifa, technology companies, and even an Internet server in Germany.

Giuliani & Co.’s seemingly amateurish approach

Giuliani was sweating under the headlights. When the dark paint ran down her cheeks to the left and right of the hairline in her ears, presumably traces of tint or mascara, the parallel to the horror movie was quickly drawn. On Twitter, it did not rain only mockery and malicebut also caveats. “This press conference was about the most dangerous 1:45 hour television in the history of the United States. And probably the most insane,” wrote Christopher Krebs, whom Trump just fired. As head of the infrastructure and cybersecurity agency, he was responsible, among other things, for securing the elections.

Although a court is locked after the next Trump camp lawsuit for lack of evidence, over the weekend, for example, in the state of Pennsylvania, where Trump apparently wanted to invalidate millions of postal votes and stop the certification of final results. for this monday. But the judge in charge wrote that the arguments of Trump’s lawyers were not even enough to invalidate the vote of “a single voter”.

Giuliani & Co.’s seemingly amateurish approach can easily hide what it is really about: overturning the outcome of an election that US authorities have already described as the safest in US history.

Trump as “the most irresponsible president”

“It would be a lot of fun if it weren’t so serious,” Los Angeles law professor Justin Levitt told the New York Times. Trump’s behavior is not only attacking the democratic process, it is also endangering national security in unprecedented ways. Since he does not admit defeat, his government has so far not allowed an orderly handover of official business to the election winner, Biden. It is increasingly affected by Trump’s refusal to acknowledge the result. It damages the reputation of American democracy, Biden said Thursday. Trump will go down in history as the “most irresponsible president” of the United States.

Rudy Giuliani and Donald Trump in 1999: The two share a long history.  (Source: imago images / Levine-Roberts)Rudy Giuliani and Donald Trump in 1999: The two share a long history. (Source: Levine-Roberts / imago images)

Giuliani causes headaches among the president’s allies. “It amazes me that this is the most important legal battle in the history of the country and that they don’t use the most famous electoral lawyers,” Trump’s former White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney said last week on Fox Business.

Unwanted appearance in the movie “Borat”

Giuliani has already gotten Trump into trouble multiple times. He was a central figure in the Ukraine affair that sparked an impeachment process against Trump. Giuliani had actively sought to persuade Ukraine to investigate Biden. In the final push of the election campaign, the 76-year-old tried in vain to spark a scandal around Biden’s son Hunter. Even the conservative media kept their hands off the story due to questionable sources.

A captivating gesture during a unwanted appearance in new movie “Borat” Comedian Sacha Baron Cohen brought Giuliani to explain. He denied sexual intent after he was filmed reaching into his pants to put his shirt on, Giuliani explained, after an interview with a young woman in a hotel room. The day the US media proclaimed Biden the winner of the election, caused a press conference Giulianis to ridiculewhich took place in front of a landscaping company called “Four Seasons” and not, as a Trump tweet suggested, at the luxury hotel of the same name.

Giuliani is unfazed

Some Trump allies apparently fear Giuliani is encouraging his friend in the White House to continue the legal battle against the election results because he sees financial advantages in it. According to the New York Times, he is said to have asked for $ 20,000 a day for the engagement, which Giuliani denies.

Despite the roughly 30 setbacks Trump and the Republicans have received, according to CNN, Rudy Giuliani is undeterred. Former New Jersey Governor Chris Christie made that clear Sunday. “Frankly, the behavior of the president’s legal team is a national disgrace,” the Republican said on ABC. He was a Trump supporter and voted for him twice. But the elections would have consequences. If attorneys don’t provide evidence of voter fraud, it can only mean one thing: “That the evidence doesn’t exist.”

[ad_2]