[ad_1]
Markus Söder (CSU) described the warning app as a “toothless tiger”, while the number of infections in Bavaria also soared. Philosopher Julian Nida-Rümelin, for his part, criticized “Anne Will” for the fact that data protection requirements hamper implementation. Given the high development and operating costs of more than 60 million euros paid by the Ministry of Health to the companies SAP and Deutsche Telekom, criticism of the application is increasingly strong.
Due to the large number of infections and the threat of overloading the health authorities, an effective warning application would be more important than ever. What is the problem, what contribution is the app currently making to fighting pandemics, and what could it ideally do?
The most important questions and answers about the role of the warning application in the second wave:
What are the biggest problems with the application?
A central problem with the German warning app is the comparatively low warning rate. Consequently, only six out of ten users of infected applications save their infection in the application. But only then the warning app can warn the contacts of the infected from the previous days and the app will work. “If you have your mask in your pocket, you wouldn’t expect it to prevent infection,” says Oxford researcher Lucie Abeler-Dörner of the low alert rate problem. The scientist is investigating the extent to which tracking apps can contain the coronavirus.
