[ad_1]
meAbout an hour before Sandra Maischberger’s broadcast began, the chancellor and the country’s 16 leaders discussed tightening the crown’s measures in Berlin. Many issues, such as the new stimulus concept of the accommodation ban, remained unresolved.
Also at Maischberger it was about what measures could help in fighting the growing number of infections. Also participating was the SPD Prime Minister of Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, Manuela Schwesig, who had recently attended the summit at the Chancellery. In the study, Bonn virologist Hendrik Streeck answered questions from the moderator.
The second focus of the night was the view of the final outbreak of the US presidential election campaign: there will be elections in just under three weeks. Maischberger spoke with Mary L. Trump, Donald Trump’s niece and political scientist Stephan Bierling. They both published a book about the president of the United States this year. “Süddeutsche Zeitung” capital correspondent Cerstin Gammelin, WELT author Susanne Gaschke and physicist and science journalist Vince Ebert took their places in the Maischberger commentator seats.
The lack of alternatives to the Corona measures
After hours of negotiations between the chancellor and the 16 prime ministers of the federal states, stricter crown measures have now been implemented. “We are much closer to the second block than we want to admit,” warned Markus Söder, visibly pleased that the “cautious team” prevailed. “I am concerned about the rhetoric of war and the lack of alternatives at this press conference,” Vince Ebert commented in Maischberger.
He saw less radical alternatives to fighting the pandemic. Cerstin Gammelin immediately contradicted herself: “There are no alternatives to what was presented today.” Everyone should be prepared for the fact that winter will be harsh and do their part to avoid a sharp increase in the number of infections.
Susanne Gaschke, on the other hand, did not believe in intimidating people, for example, with Söder’s rhetoric from five to twelve. It massively irritates apocalyptic logic. “All these things that were said today are supposed to scare you.”
Schwesig on the accommodation ban
Manuela Schwesig, Prime Minister of Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, participated in the talks with the Chancellor. In the exchange interview, he regretted that there are still no national regulations regarding travel within Germany.
His position from the beginning was that travel should be greatly restricted both outside a risk area and into a risk area.
“The Prime Minister and the Federal Chancellor decided in May that a risk zone in itself should restrict exit and entry. But that never happened. “
Together with Daniel Günther from Schleswig-Holstein, he again claimed this responsibility for the risk areas, but he could not prevail with the others.
Streck’s vision beyond infection numbers
Virologist Hendrick Streeck emphasized once again in a personal interview that it is now important to learn to live with the virus. His forecast for the next few weeks: “Germany will see a significant increase.” The question is how fast it will occur and how well it can be controlled.
Efforts must be made to protect risk groups. His criterion was not only the number of infections, but above all the burden on the health system. He suggested that the number of inpatient places, especially intensive care places, as well as the capacity of hospital beds should be taken into account.
According to Streeck, a more differentiated view of the increasing number of infections could look like this: “If we say that there are 70 cases of inpatients at any one time, then I would be concerned because we would have too few places for everyone else that potentially needs to be occupied as inpatients. . . If there are 70 cases of mild symptoms or no symptoms, then I wouldn’t worry. Then the traffic light would be green for me. “
Trump’s Destruction of American Democracy
For a final look at the election campaign in the United States, Mary L. Trump from Massachusetts tuned in. The niece of the president of the United States put clear exclamation marks with the following climax: “Another four years in the White House would mean that the United States will become a dictatorship.”
In addition, he reported on the Trump family’s disregard for addiction and disease, in which moral weakness and character flaws were always seen.
This attitude would also be reflected in how the president deals with Corona. Stephan Bierling, who has already bet against an electoral victory for Trump, certified that so far he has hardly achieved anything for his country.
“In the four years he worked almost exclusively for his constituents,” the political scientist analyzed, referring to tax cuts for the rich, the wall for angry citizens and right-wing judges for evangelicals.
Approval among those who brought him to power in 2016 is correspondingly high. On the other hand, this time, however, the Democrats are also highly mobilized and will not allow another Trump term in office.
“Now after four years of Trump, the Democrats are realizing what they have done,” Bierling said. “You want to kick Trump out of the White House.”
[ad_2]
