[ad_1]
Will Trump’s plan with Barrett work?
Image: AFP
Amy Coney Barrett is a woman of “unwavering loyalty to the constitution,” says Donald Trump. That does not mean that she is grateful to him. The president plays with fire when he thinks he can go to the Supreme Court if necessary.
reOnald Trump did not say that given certain uncertainties it was necessary to have a constitutional court capable of making decisions quickly. Nor did he emphasize that the highest legal authority should not be paralyzed if it has to decide the presidential election after November 3. Instead, he claimed, without any evidence, that Democrats were using vote-by-mail to falsify the result. And he said bluntly: “I think this will go to the Supreme Court. And I think it’s very important that we have nine judges. “
The constitutional judges, of whom he will have nominated three, should everything go according to plan in the Senate in the coming weeks and must secure a second term for him. In a way, the Supreme Court had granted him his first four years in the White House. In 2016, Trump was elected by many people only because he promised to nominate only attorneys to the Supreme Court, which the arch-conservative Federalist Society had selected. Evangelicals, many Catholics, and parts of Orthodox Judaism accepted Trump with the prospect of winning the Kulturkampf and revisiting the preceding trials from the days of left-liberal hegemony. Your bill has been worth it.
Bigottes Purpose Alliance in favor of Amy Coney Barretts
When the president presented his candidate for the vacancy on the bench on Saturday, a week after Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s death, it was not a conspiratorial community gathering in the Rose Garden of the White House, but members of an intolerant alliance. To the applause of Amy Coney Barrett, everyone had their own reasons. Trump’s calculation is not just a possible verdict on the vote count in individual states. Staff must also give a new dynamic to their election campaign. This is what most Republican senators are betting on. You are tired of having to defend the failed corona policy. Now they can promote themselves with conservative core themes.
Can Trump defend himself against Biden? A personal assessment and top American reviews from FAZ in your email inbox every Thursday.
Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, who congratulated Trump on his appointment in the Kentucky election campaign, is thinking above all about his legacy: With the shift of coordinates in the Supreme Court, he will continue to shape American politics even later. Trump has left the White House and the second chamber. They have left. He doesn’t care that McConnell is bending parliamentary practice at will and, listening to Barrett shortly before the election, does the opposite of what he presented as the immutable rule four years ago when dealing with Barack Obama’s candidates.
Massive retaliation policies
Washington politics had long been poisoned. At the beginning of Trump’s term, the Republican had changed the rules of procedure for the constitutional judge nomination process: filibusters could no longer impede votes. McConnell justified the “nuclear option” on the fact that his Democratic predecessor had abolished the democratic element of consensus four years earlier for the appointment of lower-level judges.
McConnell’s policy of massive retaliation, he is well aware, may result in the loss of the Senate majority. Because in contested states, breaking your word among swap voters is likely to do more harm than good. For him, it’s worth it: it’s about abortion rights, gun rights, freedom of religion and health policies. The Supreme Court is not supposed to be a catalyst for social change, but rather a notary of the constitution in its literal sense, as described by fundamentalist lawyers.
Bending Parliamentary Practice As He Pleases: Republican Majority Leader Mitch McConnell on Capitol Hill in Late September
:
Image: AFP
Barrett tried to allay fears about his nomination: If confirmed, he would pay attention to who had previously sat in his judge seat. Left-wing liberal Bader Ginsburg not only broke glass ceilings when it comes to women’s equality, he smashed them. Of course, Democrats remembered what positions Barrett had held so far, for example on “Roe v. Wade, ”the precedent that sets the abortion ban, or Obama’s health care reform. The conservative Catholic audience in October is sure to be heated. Democrats, however, must be careful not to repeat the mud fight that degenerated Brett Kavanaugh’s nomination process two years ago. Joe Biden also needs the votes of liberal Catholics.
Trump called Barrett a woman of “relentless loyalty to the Constitution.” That does not mean that she is grateful to him. The other two constitutional judges appointed by him have already handed down sentences that astonished him. The Supreme Court, fearing for its reputation, still struggles not to have to decide a presidential election again as it did in 2000. The justices know that Trump’s contingency plan is playing with fire.
