Of the basic law of primitiveness



[ad_1]

ANDIt is absolutely necessary and honorable to defend freedom and fundamental rights if there is a risk that they will be unduly restricted or completely denied. What the “resistance fighters” did over the weekend in protest against an “excessive” crown policy is market ignorance. They are fatal reminders of “civil courage” to the Pegida.

Regardless of the distance rules, without mouth protection, without taking into account the precedents (virus release through massive accumulations), in short: for no reason, in Stuttgart and elsewhere, freedom that is freedom without measure was promoted , without responsibility, without impact evaluation, without citizenship. But this freedom is not a fundamental right. It belongs to the basic law of primitiveness.

The personal responsibility that protesters like to talk about is actually a responsibility of the ego, a contradiction in terms. Taking responsibility means keeping in mind that your own behavior could lead to infecting others and therefore drastically restricting your freedom. In the case of the crown epidemic, this is even more important because no one can know if he is carrying the virus himself.

If you can’t handle such complexity, you should think three times before writing a stupid saying on a cardboard sign that looks like a board in front of your head. But it is truly worrying that the police can do little about it despite all the violations of the current bans. She can only hope that common sense is in the vast majority, and she stays at home.

[ad_2]