Vicky Dávila criticizes “attention” of Marta Lucía Ramírez



[ad_1]

This is how it reads in the recent column of the communicator in Semana, where she dedicated other strong sentences to the vice president for having told Colombians in Noticias Caracol: “It is not being attentive to see what the Government does for each one of us”, in the midst of the coronavirus crisis.

What is more, apart from associating the “assistance” with the rescue of the airline, Dávila did it with the banks and their emporiums, because verbatim he stated in the media:

“I do not know if the vice president is able to qualify with the same indifference the most powerful who also seek help after the pandemic. I hope that you have the word ‘attention’ ready to support a no when asked about the rescue of the Panamanian Avianca or about the gabelas to the banks, whose owners he knows very well. I do not know if he also believes that the “broken builders” or “industrialists” who in any case have badly hit their emporiums are “treated”.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE









The journalist he also criticized in his text the “watered down excuses” that Ramírez later offered, whom she believes are now being portrayed as an “inhuman leader who does not understand the suffering of the most vulnerable,” who is part of “a little empathetic policy,” and who is “burying” her presidential aspirations.

And it is that in his apologies, the vice president suggested that his phrase had been misinterpreted. “When I said ‘heed’ I did it in a context in which I expressed the need for each of us to act responsibly, from solidarity, protecting yourself and working as a team to get ahead of this crisis. If someone was offended, I make excuses, ”was what trilled.

Even so, Dávila insisted on telling him that his phrase had been “classist”, “A slap loaded with vanity that comes from someone who has had it all”, and even wondered if the vice president is aware of the tragedy experienced by those who have nothing to eat, who became unemployed or are losing their businesses.

“As if she were the owner of the public money and not the people who pay taxes. As if the government aid in times of pandemic were alms and not an obligation of the State. As if the citizens were in their houses by their own decision and not by order of the Government that she represents. What Ramírez did has no defense and is reprehensible. […] Insults them [a los ciudadanos] In the face of their pain and with a rancid command voice, he urges them to work, as if they were drones that do not have the will to work, “said the communicator in the magazine.



[ad_2]