[ad_1]
Conmebol published this Sunday the audios of the discussions between the referee and the VAR, in the match between Colombia and Uruguay, which ended with a 0-3 victory for the Uruguayan.
Fernando Rapallini was the central judge, who had disputed actions, so much so that coach Carlos Queiroz attacked him claiming that he did not give him a penalty.
In the two published plays, the VAR agrees with the central defender.
The first action that Conmebol revealed was due to an alleged hand in the Uruguayan area, after a shot by Luis Diaz. This was the dialogue with the VAR:
VAR: Possible hand
Referee: Comes from a rebound of himself
VAR That camera does not work for me, another take please .. Pie, auction
AVAR: Please explain to me Fernando, calmer
AVAR: Fernando, does he kick?
Referee: Kicks him and it bounces to him
VAR: It hits his knee, foot, and goes to hand
Referee: It is not a blocking action, it is a deliberate playing action by himself that hits his hand … He kicks and hits his hand
AVAR: He wants to play and his hand is unnaturally attached to the body.
VAR: That’s what I see
VAR: Fernando, what I see is that it hits the foot, goes up to the hand, the hand is not extended, you can resume …
(Also read: Chronicle: the passion of soccer in Colombia, in times of pandemic)
(Also read: Meluk tells him … (Queiroz and his tactic … distraction!))
The second action was on Murillo’s penalty that ended in the second Uruguayan goal.
VAR: Possible penalty
Referee: penalty
VAR: Yes, there is a contact
Referee: It is opening up, promising attack in dispute.
Referee: no ball control, promising attack in dispute.
AVAR: Well, criminal, the contact exists
VAR: Ok, Yes, okay … perfect, it hits him … We are clear that it goes to the back
AVAR: Doesn’t play the ball … Now, is there offside before? Your decision is correct, we are only checking a possible misplaced before action.
VAR: Fernando, correct decision, there is no well sanctioned offside penalty.
SPORTS
